Research AppraisalSystematic Review

Effects of Multicomponent Digital Health Interventions on Multidimensional Physical Activity in Older Adults: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials

Journal of medical Internet researchYao, Jiayi, Wang, Haozhe, Jia, Shiguan et al.29 May 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

75CEBM
Evidence: ModerateSystematic Review

PICO Framework

P — PopulationOlder adults (aged 65+ years)
I — InterventionMulticomponent digital health interventions (DHIs) including wearables, mobile apps, and human support
C — ComparatorControl groups (usual care, waitlist, or minimal intervention)
O — OutcomesDaily steps, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), light physical activity, total physical activity, and sedentary behavior

Bottom Line

This systematic review provides moderate-quality evidence that multicomponent digital health interventions can meaningfully increase daily steps and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in older adults. The interventions showed an average increase of approximately 800 steps per day and 46 minutes of MVPA per week. However, effects on sedentary behavior and light physical activity were not statistically significant. The wide prediction intervals suggest considerable variation in effectiveness across different clinical contexts. Standalone wearables and interventions with human support showed larger effect sizes. The evidence supports cautious implementation of multicomponent digital interventions for physical activity promotion in older adults, particularly when combined with human support and tailored to individual risk profiles. Clinicians should consider patient digital literacy and provide appropriate support for optimal outcomes.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: Statistically significant for daily steps and MVPA (p<0.05)

  • Effect Size: Daily steps: MD 822.8 steps/day; MVPA: MD 45.9 min/week

  • Primary Outcome: Daily steps and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA)

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Effect sizes clinically meaningful for daily steps (~800 additional steps) and MVPA (~46 additional minutes weekly)

  • Confidence Interval: Daily steps: 95% CI 198.3 to 1447.3; MVPA: 95% CI 23.9 to 67.9

Clinical Application

Moderate feasibility - requires digital literacy and access to technology, human support may enhance effectiveness Relevant to Australian aged care and chronic disease prevention strategies, aligns with RACGP guidelines for physical activity promotion in older adults Community-dwelling older adults, particularly those with chronic disease risks

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The comprehensive effects of multicomponent digital health interventions (DHIs) on multidimensional physical activity indicators and sedentary behavior (SB) remain controversial. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of multicomponent DHIs on daily steps, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), light physical activity, total physical activity, and SB in older adults. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched up to February 20, 2026. Randomized controlled trials concerning multicomponent DHIs for promoting exercise behavior in older adults were included. RoB 2.0 was used to evaluate study quality. Meta-analyses were performed using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random-effects model, and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were calculated via Nagashima adjustment to evaluate effect dispersion. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system was used to evaluate evidence certainty. RESULTS: A total of 26 randomized controlled trials (n=4129) were included. The results showed that multicomponent DHIs significantly improved daily steps (mean difference [MD] 822.8, 95% CI 198.3 to 1447.3 steps/d; 95% PI -1452.4 to 3098.0) and MVPA (MD 45.9, 95% CI 23.9 to 67.9 min/wk; 95% PI -9.4 to 101.2). However, the improvements in SB (MD -283.7, 95% CI -610.8 to 43.5 min/wk; 95% PI -984.5 to 417.1), total physical activity (MD 104.4; 95% CI -109.2 to 318.0 min/wk; 95% PI -444.4 to 653.2), and light physical activity (MD 39.3, 95% CI -96.2 to 174.7 min/wk; 95% PI -227.6 to 306.2) did not reach statistical significance. As some included studies combined digital tools with human support, the independent contribution of digital technology remains uncertain. PIs indicated a certain degree of dispersion across different clinical contexts. Subgroup analysis showed higher effect sizes for standalone wearables, human-assisted interventions, and populations with chronic disease risks. Meta-regression showed that effect sizes remained stable across different ages and durations. The trim-and-fill method confirmed the robustness of MVPA results. GRADE assessment indicated "moderate" certainty for MVPA and "low" for daily steps and other indicators. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review suggests that multicomponent DHIs may serve as an effective means for enhancing daily steps and MVPA in older adults. The innovation lies in evaluating the true effect distribution of multicomponent DHIs through Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random-effects models and Nagashima PIs. Compared with previous studies, this review identified the impact of population characteristics and control group differences on effect estimates using PI and subgroup models, confirming that advanced age did not significantly diminish the good adaptability of older adults to DHIs. Evidence limitations include high heterogeneity, lack of long-term follow-up, and differences between objective and subjective measurement tools. In practice, priority should be given to hardware carriers with simplified interaction and integrated human support, with tailored strategies developed for different risk subgroups.

References

  1. 1.Yao, J., Wang, H., Jia, S., Chen, H., He, J., Long, J., & Chen, S. (2026). Effects of Multicomponent Digital Health Interventions on Multidimensional Physical Activity in Older Adults: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 28(5), e91338. https://doi.org/10.2196/91338
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service