Effects of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors on lipid profiles in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Patients with chronic kidney disease (both dialysis-dependent and non-dialysis-dependent) |
| I — Intervention | Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) including roxadustat, desidustat, and molidustat |
| C — Comparator | Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) or placebo |
| O — Outcomes | Primary: changes in LDL-C, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-C; Secondary: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, all-cause mortality |
Bottom Line
This comprehensive meta-analysis of 20 RCTs involving over 12,000 CKD patients demonstrates that roxadustat, a HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, produces significant reductions in LDL cholesterol (16 mg/dL), total cholesterol (25 mg/dL), and triglycerides (20 mg/dL), though it also reduces HDL cholesterol. Other HIF-PHIs showed more modest or no lipid effects. Critically, despite these favorable lipid changes, no significant improvements in cardiovascular outcomes were observed, including no reduction in cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or all-cause mortality. For Australian clinicians managing CKD anemia, while roxadustat offers the convenience of oral administration and some lipid benefits, these metabolic improvements do not translate into demonstrable cardiovascular protection. The lipid-lowering effects should be considered as a potential secondary benefit rather than a primary indication, with established cardiovascular risk management strategies remaining paramount in CKD patients.
Key Findings
P Value: Not explicitly reported but confidence intervals suggest statistical significance for roxadustat lipid effects
Effect Size: Moderate lipid-lowering effects for roxadustat, minimal for other HIF-PHIs
Primary Outcome: Roxadustat significantly reduced LDL-C by 16.07 mg/dL (95% CI: -17.92 to -14.21)
Nnt Or Sensitivity: No cardiovascular benefit: RR 1.00 for CV death (95% CI: 0.84-1.18), RR 1.06 for all-cause mortality (95% CI: 0.96-1.17)
Confidence Interval: Narrow confidence intervals suggesting good precision for lipid outcomes
Clinical Application
HIF-PHIs are oral agents, potentially more convenient than injectable ESAs, but lipid benefits don't translate to cardiovascular outcomes Relevant to Australian nephrology practice; roxadustat approved by TGA for CKD anemia. Lipid effects may be considered alongside established cardiovascular risk management per RACGP guidelines CKD patients requiring anemia management, both dialysis-dependent and non-dialysis-dependent
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are novel oral agents for treating anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD), with potential effects on lipid modulation. We aimed to systematically evaluate the effects of HIF-PHIs on lipid profiles and cardiovascular outcomes in CKD patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase (Ovid) were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing HIF-PHIs with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) or placebo in dialysis-dependent (DD) or nondialysis-dependent (NDD) CKD patients. Primary outcomes included changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular outcomes, including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 20 trials involving 12,155 patients were analyzed in this review. Roxadustat significantly reduced LDL-C (mean difference [MD], -16.07 mg/dL; 95% CI, -17.92 to -14.21; 14 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 10,510 patients), total cholesterol (MD, -25.25 mg/dL; 95% CI, -29.70 to -20.81; 10 RCTs, 5,538 patients), triglycerides (MD, -19.70 mg/dL; 95% CI, -30.78 to -8.61; 9 RCTs, 4,616 patients), but also decreased HDL-C (MD, -4.91 mg/dL; 95% CI, -6.80 to -3.02; 9 RCTs, 5,132 patients). Desidustat significantly reduced LDL-C and total cholesterol, but showed no significant effects on triglycerides or HDL-C, whereas molidustat showed no significant lipid-lowering effects. Overall, treatment with HIF-PHIs was not associated with significant differences in cardiovascular death (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.18; 10 RCTs, 9,371 patients), myocardial infarction (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.38; 15 RCTs, 11,265 patients), stroke (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.61; 14 RCTs, 11,136 patients), or all-cause mortality (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.17; 19 RCTs, 11,903 patients), compared with ESAs or placebo. CONCLUSION: Roxadustat showed the most substantial lipid-lowering effects, while desidustat showed significant reductions in LDL-C and total cholesterol but no significant effects on triglycerides or HDL-C, and molidustat showed no significant effects. Despite these changes in lipid profiles, no significant differences in cardiovascular outcomes were observed for these three HIF-PHIs, compared with ESAs or placebo.
References
- 1.Huang, Y. H., Huang, Y. H., Peng, T. R., & Wu, T. W. (2026). Effects of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors on lipid profiles in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001423
Related Research
International urology and nephrology
Acute kidney injury prediction and prognostication using machine learning
1 Aug 2026
Journal of robotic surgery
Robot-assisted versus open kidney transplantation: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
27 July 2026
Journal of robotic surgery
Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal single-port robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and functional outcomes
21 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service