Research AppraisalRandomised Controlled Trial

Effects of a school-based ACT program on motivation, physical activity participation, motor competence, and physical performance in physically inactive female adolescent students

PloS oneGharayagh Zandi, Hassan, Shaabani, Fatemeh, Noferesti, Azam et al.DOI

Clinical Snapshot

50CEBM
Evidence: WeakRandomised Controlled Trial

PICO Framework

P — PopulationPhysically inactive female adolescent students aged 13-18 years
I — InterventionSchool-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) program with seven sessions targeting six core ACT processes
C — ComparatorControl group (no intervention specified)
O — OutcomesPhysical activity participation, motivation (intrinsic/extrinsic), motor competence (perceived and actual), and physical fitness performance

Bottom Line

This RCT suggests that a seven-session school-based ACT intervention may improve motivation and physical activity in inactive adolescent girls. While the comprehensive outcome measures and significant results (p ≤ 0.05) are encouraging, the study suffers from substantial methodological reporting limitations. Critical details about randomisation, blinding, dropout rates, effect sizes, and control group management are missing. The intervention appears theoretically sound and practically feasible for Australian schools, potentially addressing the concerning decline in adolescent female physical activity participation. However, clinicians and educators should await full publication with complete methodological details before implementing such programs. The lack of adverse event reporting and cost analysis also limits assessment of the intervention's overall risk-benefit profile.

Evidence: Weak

Key Findings

  • P Value: p ≤ 0.05 for most outcomes

  • Effect Size: Not reported

  • Primary Outcome: Significant improvements in intrinsic motivation, identified regulation, autonomy, and reduced amotivation and external regulation

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not calculable from available data

  • Confidence Interval: Not reported

Clinical Application

Seven-session ACT program appears feasible for school implementation with appropriate training Highly relevant to Australian secondary schools; aligns with national physical activity guidelines and school health promotion initiatives Physically inactive female adolescents in secondary school settings

Abstract

Adolescents face internal barriers like low self-confidence and psychological discomfort that limit physical activity. Adolescence offers a key window to enhance intrinsic motivation. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) may effectively improve physical activity and motor competence through psychological flexibility and value-based behavior. This study examined the effects of an ACT-based intervention on physical activity participation, motivation, motor competence, and physical fitness in physically inactive adolescent girls. A randomized controlled trial involved 132 inactive girls aged 13-18, randomly assigned to either an ACT intervention or a control group. Intervention included seven sessions targeting six core ACT processes. Pre-and post-intervention assessments used standardized questionnaires and tests for physical activity participation, motivation, physical activity, motor competence, and fitness. ACT group showed significant improvements in intrinsic motivation, identified regulation, autonomy, and reduced amotivation and external regulation (p ≤ 0.05). Introjected regulation did not show a significant change (p > 0.05). Physical activity participation and fitness performance also improved significantly, along with both perceived and actual motor competence (p ≤ 0.05). ACT-based intervention effectively enhanced motivation, physical activity engagement, motor competence, and fitness. These findings support integrating ACT into school or community programs to promote sustainable physical activity habits in adolescent girls.

Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service