Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions in Older Adults With Frailty and Sarcopenia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Clinical Snapshot

Key Findings

• P Value: Significant results for multiple outcomes, with subgroup analysis P-values of 0.0016 for ASMI and 0.0195 for balance

• Effect Size: Significant improvements in total skeletal muscle mass (WMD 1.01), gait speed (WMD 0.09), TUGT (WMD -0.52), 30CST (WMD 2.19), balance (SMD 0.61), and quality of life (SMD 0.16)

• Primary Outcome: Multiple outcomes assessed including muscle mass and physical performance

• Nnt Or Sensitivity: Effect sizes generally small to moderate; clinical significance uncertain given wide prediction intervals

• Confidence Interval: 95% CIs provided for all outcomes, with most showing statistical significance

Clinical Application

Moderate feasibility; requires digital literacy and access to technology, which may be limited in older adults Relevant to Australian aged care settings; aligns with TGA digital health initiatives and could support PBS-funded aged care programs, though implementation would require consideration of digital divide in older populations Older adults with diagnosed frailty and sarcopenia in community or healthcare settings

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frailty and sarcopenia represent substantial global health challenges, frequently diminishing patients' quality of life through impaired muscle function and physical performance. Digital health interventions (DHIs) have shown promise in mitigating these conditions among older adults. However, outcomes of such interventions in this demographic are inconsistent, and a thorough synthesis of existing evidence is lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of DHIs in older adults with frailty and sarcopenia. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted from their inception until January 2026 to identify randomized controlled trials. Meta-analyses were performed using R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Study quality was evaluated using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 (Cochrane Collaboration), and evidence certainty was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). RESULTS: From 3506 records, 16 studies were included. DHIs significantly improved total skeletal muscle mass (weighted mean difference [WMD] 1.01, 95% CI 0.08-1.94, 95% prediction interval [PI] -0.95 to 2.96), gait speed (WMD 0.09, 95% CI 0.03-0.15, 95% PI -0.1 to 0.26), Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT: WMD -0.52, 95% CI -1.02 to -0.03, 95% PI -1.93 to 0.85), 30-second Chair Stand Test (30CST: WMD 2.19, 95% CI 0.89-3.48, 95% PI -1.59 to 5.66), balance (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.61, 95% CI 0-1.21, 95% PI -0.94 to 2.13), and quality of life (SMD 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.27, 95% PI 0.04-0.28). No significant improvements were observed in Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass Index (ASMI), grip strength, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), 2-minute walk test (2MWT), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), or BMI. Although the pooled effect was favorable, the wide 95% PI suggests substantial between-study heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis stratified by intervention duration revealed significant intersubgroup differences in ASMI (χ²₁=9.93; P=.0016), indicating interventions lasting ≥12 weeks were more effective for improving ASMI (WMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.06-0.50, 95% PI -0.30 to 0.83). Subgroup analysis stratified by intervention type showed significant intersubgroup differences in balance (χ²₃=9.89; P=.0195), with exergame-based interventions showing significant effects (SMD 0.83, 95% CI 0.26-1.40). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review is the first to quantify the disease-specific efficacy of DHIs in improving muscle function, physical performance, and quality of life among older adults with frailty and sarcopenia, demonstrating their unique value as a scalable complementary approach. By overcoming geographical and resource constraints, DHIs support underserved populations. However, low evidence quality and heterogeneity warrant cautious interpretation. The 95% PIs indicate that actual effects may vary with population characteristics and implementation contexts. Nonetheless, DHIs represent a promising and cost-effective strategy for service expansion. Future high-quality studies are needed to better understand their effectiveness and implementation across settings.

References

1. 1.Dai, T., Guo, C., Gao, L., Huang, J., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Gao, J., & Feng, X. (2026). Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions in Older Adults With Frailty and Sarcopenia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/88374