Effectiveness and safety of proton therapy in intracranial meningioma treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Adult patients with intracranial meningiomas (WHO Grades I-III) |
| I — Intervention | Proton therapy (dose range 13-70.2 Gy RBE) |
| C — Comparator | No specific comparator (single-arm studies) |
| O — Outcomes | Overall survival, local control, complication rates, toxicity |
Bottom Line
This meta-analysis of 19 studies (1,431 patients) suggests proton therapy achieves good outcomes in intracranial meningiomas with 91% 5-year survival and 16% complication rates. However, extremely high heterogeneity (I² >88%) significantly limits confidence in pooled estimates. The wide dose range (13-70.2 Gy RBE) and varied treatment protocols indicate substantial clinical diversity. While proton therapy appears promising for anatomically complex meningiomas where normal tissue sparing is critical, the evidence quality is insufficient to establish clear superiority over conventional radiotherapy. The authors appropriately acknowledge the need for prospective comparative studies. Clinicians should consider proton therapy on a case-by-case basis, particularly for patients where conventional radiotherapy poses high risks to critical structures, while recognizing the current evidence limitations.
Key Findings
P Value: p < 0.001 for survival and complications
Effect Size: Complication rate: 16% (95% CI 5-27%)
Primary Outcome: 5-year overall survival: 91% (95% CI 88-94%)
Nnt Or Sensitivity: High heterogeneity limits clinical interpretation (I² = 98.5% for complications)
Confidence Interval: Local control: 71% (95% CI 50-86%)
Clinical Application
Limited by proton therapy availability and cost; requires specialized centres Proton therapy available at select centres; PBS coverage limited; consider for cases where conventional radiotherapy poses high normal tissue risk Adult patients with intracranial meningiomas, particularly those with anatomically complex or incompletely resected tumors
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors, often treated surgically. However, complete resection is frequently limited by proximity to critical structures, necessitating adjuvant or definitive radiotherapy. Proton therapy offers dosimetric advantages over photon-based radiotherapy, particularly in sparing adjacent normal tissues. This study aims to systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of proton therapy for intracranial meningiomas across tumor grades and clinical scenarios. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane from inception to November 10, 2025. Studies were eligible if they reported clinical outcomes of proton therapy in ≥ 10 adult meningioma patients. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Pooled complication rates and survival outcomes were calculated using random-effects models. Nineteen studies involving 1,431 patients were included. WHO Grade I tumors comprised 70.6% of cases; Grades II/III made up 25.2% and 4.2%, respectively. The most common proton dose regimens ranged from 13 to 70.2 Gy (RBE). The pooled complication rate was 16% (95% CI 5-27; p < 0.001; I² = 98.5%). Nine studies reported a statistically significant 5-year overall-survival proportion of 91% (95% CI 88-94; p < 0.001; I² = 49.3%). Radiologic local control averaged 71% (95% CI 50-86; I² = 88.2%). Proton therapy provides effective tumor control with acceptable toxicity, especially for low-grade or anatomically complex meningiomas. It is a valuable option for select patients, though further prospective studies are needed to optimize dosing and assess long-term outcomes.
References
- 1.Wijaya, J. H., Elashry, A. R., Javaid, S., Khaled, M., Jibu, B., Narayanan, B., Perez-Chadid, D. A., Azmi, A., Avila-Madrigal, J. P., Ginalis, E. E., & Nanda, A. (2026). Effectiveness and safety of proton therapy in intracranial meningioma treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgical Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02823-7
Related Research
Clinical spine surgery
An Introduction to Machine Learning for the Practicing Spine Surgeon
2 Aug 2026
Brain and behavior
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Poor Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
1 Aug 2026
Neurosurgical review
Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting postoperative hydrocephalus in 1,073 posterior fossa tumor patients
31 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service