Research AppraisalSystematic Review

Effect of preterm birth on neonatal, infant, child, young adult and adult mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of perinatal medicineMalshe, Nandini Shashikant, Kapoor, Anuva, Deshmukh, Kalyani P et al.26 May 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

85CEBM
Evidence: ModerateSystematic Review

PICO Framework

P — PopulationPreterm infants (born before 37 weeks gestation) across various age groups from neonatal period to adulthood
I — InterventionPreterm birth exposure
C — ComparatorTerm birth (≥37 weeks gestation)
O — OutcomesMortality rates across age groups: neonatal (0-28 days), infant (0-1 year), child (1-5 years), young adult, and adult mortality

Bottom Line

This comprehensive meta-analysis of 23 studies demonstrates that preterm birth significantly increases mortality risk, with the highest risk during infancy (11.84-fold increase) and neonatal period (6.12-fold increase). The risk persists but diminishes through childhood (1.88-fold at 1-5 years) and becomes non-significant in adulthood. These findings support intensive neonatal care and structured long-term follow-up for preterm infants. However, the very wide confidence intervals, particularly for adult outcomes, indicate substantial uncertainty. The evidence strongly supports current Australian practices of enhanced surveillance and developmental follow-up for preterm children, with implications for resource allocation in neonatal intensive care and community paediatric services.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not reported in abstract

  • Effect Size: Neonatal RR 6.12, Infant RR 11.84, Child (1-5y) RR 1.88, Adult RR 1.21

  • Primary Outcome: Mortality risk across age groups in preterm vs term births

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Highest risk in infancy (11.84-fold increased risk), diminishing but persistent through childhood

  • Confidence Interval: Neonatal: 3.16-11.84, Infant: 6.88-20.37, Child: 1.24-2.83, Adult: 0.07-20.12

Clinical Application

Highly feasible - supports existing Australian preterm follow-up protocols and NICU care standards Aligns with ANZNN registry data and supports PBS-funded developmental follow-up programs. Reinforces RACGP guidelines for enhanced surveillance of preterm children and TGA-approved interventions for high-risk neonates All preterm infants in Australian neonatal units and follow-up programs

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Preterm birth is associated with a higher risk of mortality. In 2020, the global incidence of preterm births was reported at 9.9 per 100 live births. This meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the effect of preterm birth on mortality among various age groups. METHODS: A thorough search was done on four electronic databases: "PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase". Adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, observational analytical studies published till 4th December 2024 were included. Screening of the studies was done by two independent reviewers in two stages: title/abstract, followed by full text review of the advanced articles. It was followed by data extraction. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis using a random-effects model was done in R Studio. PROSPERO ID: CRD42024622282. RESULTS: Database search yielded 1775 unique studies. 23 studies met the final predefined eligibility criteria. Preterm babies showed an increased risk of mortality compared to term babies with a pooled relative risk of 6.12 (95 % CI: 3.16-11.84) for neonatal mortality, 11.84 (95 % CI: 6.88-20.37) for infant mortality and 1.88 (95 % CI: 1.24-2.83) for 1-5 year. However, it was similar in adult mortality with a pooled relative risk of 1.21 (95 % CI: 0.07-20.12). CONCLUSIONS: Preterm birth is strongly associated with increased risks of childhood mortality, especially in extreme and very preterm infants, but the risk persists even for late preterms.

References

  1. 1.Malshe, N. S., Kapoor, A., Deshmukh, K. P., Goyal, C., & Gandhi, A. P. (2026). Effect of preterm birth on neonatal, infant, child, young adult and adult mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004447
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service