Effect of aerobic exercise of different intensity on articular cartilage metabolism in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | 120 adults with knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3) |
| I — Intervention | Low-intensity (50-60% HRR), moderate-intensity (60-70% HRR), or high-intensity (70-80% HRR) aerobic exercise (treadmill walking or stationary cycling) for 12 weeks, 3 sessions per week |
| C — Comparator | Control group (no exercise intervention) |
| O — Outcomes | Primary: serum C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein levels. Secondary: WOMAC scores, VAS pain, 6-minute walk test, MRI-assessed cartilage morphology |
Bottom Line
This randomised trial suggests that high-intensity aerobic exercise (70-80% heart rate reserve) may be more effective than lower intensities for improving cartilage metabolism and clinical outcomes in knee osteoarthritis patients. The high-intensity group achieved clinically meaningful improvements in pain, function, and cartilage biomarkers, with 73-80% of participants reaching minimal clinically important differences. However, methodological limitations including unclear randomisation procedures, missing dropout data, and lack of confidence intervals limit confidence in these findings. While the safety profile appears favourable with only minor, self-resolving adverse events, the study challenges current conservative exercise recommendations. Australian clinicians should consider that supervised high-intensity exercise may benefit selected knee OA patients, but individualised assessment of exercise tolerance and cardiovascular fitness is essential before prescribing intensive protocols.
Key Findings
P Value: P < .001 for primary outcomes, group × time interaction F(3,108) = 4.82, P = .003
Effect Size: WOMAC improvement -45.3%, VAS pain reduction -52.5% in high-intensity group
Primary Outcome: High-intensity exercise showed greatest reductions in cartilage degradation biomarkers: CTX-II (-28.5%) and COMP (-22.3%)
Nnt Or Sensitivity: MCID achievement: 73% for WOMAC, 80% for VAS pain in high-intensity group
Confidence Interval: Not reported
Clinical Application
Highly feasible - uses standard exercise equipment (treadmills, stationary bikes) with heart rate monitoring available in most physiotherapy and exercise physiology clinics Aligns with RACGP osteoarthritis guidelines emphasising exercise as first-line treatment. Exercise physiology services available through Medicare chronic disease management plans. May reduce need for costly interventions like joint replacement Adults with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis (KL grade 2-3) who can tolerate supervised aerobic exercise
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a leading cause of disability worldwide, yet optimal exercise intensity for cartilage protection remains unclear. This randomized controlled trial investigated dose-response effects of aerobic exercise intensity on cartilage metabolism, clinical symptoms, and structural outcomes in knee OA patients. METHODS: One hundred twenty participants with knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3) were randomly assigned to low-intensity (50-60% heart rate reserve [HRR]), moderate-intensity (60-70% HRR), high-intensity (70-80% HRR) treadmill walking or stationary cycling, or a control group for 12 weeks (3 sessions/week). Heart rate was continuously monitored using Polar H10 chest-strap monitors. Primary outcomes were serum C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein levels. Secondary outcomes included Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain, 6-minute walk test, and magnetic resonance imaging-assessed cartilage morphology. Data were analyzed using mixed-model repeated measures analysis of variance with IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0 (IBM Corp.). RESULTS: The high-intensity group demonstrated the greatest reductions in C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen (-28.5%, P < .001) and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (-22.3%, P < .001), the largest improvements in WOMAC scores (-45.3%, P < .001) and VAS pain (-52.5%, P < .001), and the greatest increases in cartilage thickness (+4.2%) and volume (+3.8%). A significant dose-response relationship was confirmed (group × time interaction: F (3108) = 4.82, P = .003). Among participants in the high-intensity group, 73% achieved the minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for WOMAC total score and 80% achieved the MCID for VAS pain. The 6-minute walk test improvement in the high-intensity group (71 m) exceeded the established MCID of 26 m. No serious adverse events were reported; minor events (transient knee pain exacerbation and delayed-onset muscle soreness) resolved spontaneously within 48 to 72 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriately prescribed high-intensity aerobic exercise safely and effectively improved cartilage metabolism, alleviated symptoms, and enhanced functional capacity in knee OA patients. These findings support revising current conservative exercise recommendations upward when tolerable.
References
- 1.Song, L., & Meng, Y. (2026). Effect of aerobic exercise of different intensity on articular cartilage metabolism in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine, 105(22), e48913. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000048913
Related Research
The Journal of rheumatology
Examining the Role of Wearables in Inflammatory Arthritis Care: A Narrative Literature Review
3 Aug 2026
Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America
Demystifying Artificial Intelligence: Key Concepts with Examples in Rheumatology
2 Aug 2026
Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America
Machine Learning-Enhanced Autoantibody Discovery and Diagnostics in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases
2 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service