Early kangaroo care in preterm ≤32 weeks and very low birth weight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Very preterm infants (≤32 weeks gestational age) and/or very low birth weight infants (<1,500g) |
| I — Intervention | Early kangaroo care (skin-to-skin contact initiated within first 24 hours) |
| C — Comparator | Conventional neonatal care |
| O — Outcomes | Mortality, infection risk, hypothermia, and other neonatal morbidities |
Bottom Line
This meta-analysis of 4 RCTs involving 1,679 very preterm and VLBW infants suggests early kangaroo care (within 24 hours) reduces mortality risk by 19% compared to conventional care. While the mortality benefit appears robust, effects on infection and hypothermia were less consistent. The evidence supports early implementation of kangaroo care in stable very preterm infants, though more research is needed for extremely preterm infants (<28 weeks or <1000g). Australian NICUs should consider early kangaroo care protocols as part of family-centred developmental care, ensuring appropriate staff training and family support systems are in place.
Key Findings
P Value: Statistically significant (CI excludes 1.0)
Effect Size: 19% relative risk reduction in mortality
Primary Outcome: Mortality reduction with early kangaroo care
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Number needed to treat would depend on baseline mortality risk in population
Confidence Interval: RR=0.81 (95% CI: 0.67-0.98)
Clinical Application
Requires trained staff, appropriate facilities, and family engagement; implementation varies by unit capacity Aligns with NHMRC guidelines supporting family-centred care; implementation supported by most tertiary NICUs across Australia Very preterm infants ≤32 weeks and VLBW infants <1500g in NICU settings
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Kangaroo care (KC), involving skin-to-skin contact, early breastfeeding and early discharge, demonstrated benefits in improving outcomes for preterm and low birth weight infants. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of early KC (initiated within the first 24 h) vs. conventional neonatal care in very preterm infants (≤32 weeks) and/or very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (<1,500 g). METHODS: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases was conducted. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early KC to conventional care in very preterm and/or VLBW infants were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using R, with relative risks (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) calculated. RESULTS: Four RCTs, encompassing 1,679 newborns, were included. Meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in mortality risk (RR=0.81, 95 % CI: 0.67-0.98) with early KC. The pooled RR for infection risk was 0.89 (95 % CI: 0.77-1.02). The impact on hypothermia was mixed, with moderate heterogeneity observed. CONCLUSIONS: Early KC may reduce mortality and morbidity in very preterm and VLBW infants although its effects on hypothermia vary by severity. Further studies are required to assess its effects on infants weighing <1,000 g or born before 28 weeks of gestation.
References
- 1.Martins, J. A., Ferreira-da-Silva, R., Assunção, A., Clemente, F., Azevedo, I., & Costa, S. (2026). Early kangaroo care in preterm ≤32 weeks and very low birth weight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-016-0274-3
Related Research
Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine
Intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants: A systematic review of risk- and outcome-prediction models
2 Aug 2026
Indian journal of pediatrics
Emerging Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Care
2 Aug 2026
JAMA
Prone Positioning in Infants With Acute Bronchiolitis: The PROPOSITIS Randomized Clinical Trial
30 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service