Research AppraisalRandomised Controlled Trial

Durvalumab in Combination With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Long-Term Analysis From the GeparNuevo Trial

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical OncologyLoibl, Sibylle, Untch, Michael, Huober, Jens et al.10 June 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

85CEBM
Evidence: ModerateRandomised Controlled Trial

PICO Framework

P — Population174 patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (cT1b-cT4a-d)
I — InterventionDurvalumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel followed by dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide)
C — ComparatorPlacebo plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (same regimen)
O — OutcomesPrimary: pathologic complete response rate; Secondary: invasive disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival, overall survival at 86.4 months median follow-up

Bottom Line

This long-term analysis of the GeparNuevo trial demonstrates that adding durvalumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer provides sustained survival benefits at 86.4 months follow-up. The study shows clinically meaningful improvements in invasive disease-free survival (44% risk reduction), distant disease-free survival (59% risk reduction), and overall survival (67% risk reduction). Notably, benefits were observed regardless of pathologic complete response, challenging current paradigms about the necessity of adjuvant checkpoint inhibitor continuation. Patients with nodal involvement and those with high stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in residual disease appeared to derive particular benefit. While these results are promising, clinicians should note this was a phase II study with 174 patients, and safety data weren't presented in this analysis. The findings support considering neoadjuvant immunotherapy in appropriate TNBC patients, though implementation would require regulatory approval and careful patient selection based on performance status and contraindications to checkpoint inhibitors.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: iDFS P=0.0431; DDFS P=0.0069; OS P=0.0085

  • Effect Size: iDFS HR 0.56, DDFS HR 0.41, OS HR 0.33

  • Primary Outcome: Pathologic complete response rate (not reported in abstract)

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: 7-year iDFS rates: 92.3% (high sTILs in RD) vs 51.4% (low sTILs in RD)

  • Confidence Interval: iDFS: 95% CI 0.32-0.99; DDFS: 95% CI 0.21-0.80; OS: 95% CI 0.14-0.79

Clinical Application

Requires access to durvalumab and expertise in managing immune checkpoint inhibitors during neoadjuvant treatment Durvalumab available through PBS for other indications; would require TGA approval and PBS listing for this indication. Aligns with current NCCN and ESMO guidelines supporting immunotherapy in TNBC Patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (cT1b-cT4a-d) suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Abstract

The phase II GeparNuevo trial investigated whether adding durvalumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) only in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer cT1b-cT4a-d would improve pathologic complete response (pCR) rate and patient survival. Hundred and seventy-four patients were randomly assigned to receive durvalumab or placebo concurrently with nab-paclitaxel once per week and followed by dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. With 86.4 months of median follow-up compared with the previously reported 43.7 months, durvalumab showed sustained significant improvements in long-term outcomes as defined by STEEP compared with placebo regarding not only invasive disease-free survival (iDFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.56 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.99]; stratified log-rank P = .0431), but also distant disease-free survival (DDFS; HR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.80]; P = .0069) and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.79]; P = .0085). All analyses were stratified by stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) at baseline (low [≤10%], intermediate [11%-59%], high [≥60%]). In exploratory subgroup analysis, patients with nodal involvement at baseline demonstrated a greater iDFS benefit (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.144 to 0.771]; P = .01; Pinteraction = 0.045). sTILs in residual disease (RD) could be assessed in 39/71 patients without pCR. Post hoc analyses by sTILs high (>10%) versus low (≤10%) in RD showed estimated 7-year iDFS rates of 92.3% (95% CI, 56.6 to 98.9) and 51.4% (95% CI, 29.2 to 69.7), respectively. Hence, adding durvalumab to dose-dense NACT without adjuvant continuation of checkpoint inhibition improved long-term survival outcomes, irrespective of the extent of pathologic response. This underscores the necessity to re-evaluate the adjuvant continuation of checkpoint inhibition.

References

  1. 1.Loibl, S., Untch, M., Huober, J., Schaser, V., Braun, M., Denkert, C., Hartkopf, A., Blohmer, J.-U., Hanusch, C., Link, T., Reinisch, M., Zahm, D.-M., Weide, R., Bjelic-Radisic, V., Staib, P., Tesch, H., Rhiem, K., Lorenz, R., Rey, J., & Schneeweiss, A. (2026). Durvalumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer: Long-term analysis from the GeparNuevo trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-25-02311
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service