Duration of apnoea before start of backup ventilation during nCPAP in extremely preterm infants and time spent within the SpO2 target: a randomised cross-over study
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | 24 extremely preterm infants <28 weeks gestational age on nasal continuous positive airway pressure with backup ventilation (median GA 24+5 weeks, birth weight 628g, postnatal age 48 days) |
| I — Intervention | Short apnoea duration before backup ventilation initiation (4 seconds) |
| C — Comparator | Long apnoea duration before backup ventilation initiation (16 seconds) |
| O — Outcomes | Primary: time spent within SpO2 target range (88-95% or ≥88% with FiO2=0.21). Secondary: hypoxaemic episodes, cerebral tissue oxygenation, ventilatory parameters |
Bottom Line
This well-designed cross-over RCT in 22 extremely preterm infants found no clinically meaningful difference in time spent within oxygen saturation targets when comparing short (4-second) versus long (16-second) apnoea duration thresholds before backup ventilation initiation during nCPAP therapy. Both strategies achieved approximately 67% time within target SpO2 ranges, with no differences in hypoxaemic episodes or cerebral oxygenation. The shorter threshold resulted in significantly more backup ventilation episodes without improving oxygenation outcomes. These findings suggest that simply reducing apnoea duration thresholds does not optimise respiratory support in this vulnerable population. Clinicians should focus on other strategies to improve oxygenation stability in extremely preterm infants, as current non-invasive respiratory support approaches leave substantial room for improvement in achieving optimal oxygen saturation targets.
Key Findings
P Value: 0.88
Effect Size: Mean difference: -0.3% (not clinically significant)
Primary Outcome: Time spent within SpO2 target range: 66.9% (AD 4) vs 67.2% (AD 16)
Nnt Or Sensitivity: No clinically meaningful benefit demonstrated; higher backup ventilation rate with AD 4
Confidence Interval: Not reported in abstract
Clinical Application
Highly feasible - requires only ventilator setting adjustment, no additional equipment or training Relevant to Australian NICU practice; aligns with ANZNN registry population characteristics and standard nCPAP protocols used across Australian tertiary centres Extremely preterm infants <28 weeks gestation requiring nCPAP with backup ventilation in Australian NICUs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Central apnoea due to immaturity of the respiratory drive constitutes the main cause of frequent and prolonged desaturations in extremely preterm (EPT) infants <28 weeks. We investigated the impact of varying the duration of apnoea before backup ventilation (BUV) on the measures of oxygenation in EPT infants during nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) therapy. DESIGN: Single-centre randomised cross-over trial. SETTING: Level 3 neonatal intensive care unit. PATIENTS: 24 EPT infants on nCPAP with BUV. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the time spent within a predefined oxygen saturation (SpO2) target (88%-95% or ≥88% with fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) =0.21) during start of BUV after 4 s of apnoea duration (AD 4) or 16 s of apnoea duration (AD 16) RESULTS: The study was successfully completed in 22 children (median gestational age 24+5 weeks, birth weight 628 g, postnatal age 48 days). Mean time spent within the SpO2 target didn't differ between AD 4 and AD 16 (66.9% vs 67.2%, p=0.88). There were no differences in the time below or above the SpO2 target, prolonged (>30 s, >60 s, >120 s) and severe (<80%, <70%) episodes of hypoxaemias and cerebral tissue oxygenation. Mean FiO2, mean airway pressure, transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure, heart rate and respiratory frequency did not differ while the rate of BUV was significantly higher during AD 4. CONCLUSION: Reducing the time of apnoea until start of BUV didn't improve the time spent within the SpO2 target in respiratory unstable EPT infants. Our data demand intensified efforts to specify these settings of non-invasive respiratory support that better achieve this important clinical goal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00031911.
References
- 1.Ströbele, S., Jung, T., Kraft, D., Forsteneichner, N., Mair, E.-M., Schiefele, L., Schmid, S., Waitz, M., Linhoff, V., Westhoff, A., Dreyhaupt, J., Sohrabi, K., & Ehrhardt, H. (2026). Duration of apnoea before start of backup ventilation during nCPAP in extremely preterm infants and time spent within the SpO2 target: a randomised cross-over study. Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-328734
Related Research
Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine
Intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants: A systematic review of risk- and outcome-prediction models
2 Aug 2026
Indian journal of pediatrics
Emerging Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Care
2 Aug 2026
JAMA
Prone Positioning in Infants With Acute Bronchiolitis: The PROPOSITIS Randomized Clinical Trial
30 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service