Drug repurposing in oncology: Bridging computational discovery to clinical application.
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Patients with cancer (broad oncology population, including various tumour types); also encompasses preclinical models (cell lines, animal models, patient-derived organoids) |
| I — Intervention | Drug repurposing strategies — encompassing computational approaches (molecular docking, machine learning, transcriptomic-proteomic signature reversal, network-based modelling) and experimental pipelines (high-throughput screening, phenotypic assays, biochemical validation, functional animal models) |
| C — Comparator | Traditional de novo drug development; no explicit head-to-head comparator defined within the review |
| O — Outcomes | Identification of repurposable anticancer agents; anticancer efficacy via modulation of key oncogenic signalling pathways (PI3K/AKT/mTOR, MAPK/ERK, Wnt/β-catenin, redox homeostasis, DNA damage response); barriers to clinical translation; integration of multi-omics, explainable AI, organoids, and CRISPR screens for precision repurposing |
Bottom Line
This narrative review from Annamalai University provides a broad conceptual synthesis of drug repurposing strategies in oncology, spanning computational discovery tools to experimental validation pipelines. It correctly identifies drug repurposing as a pragmatic response to the high costs and attrition rates of de novo oncology drug development, and usefully catalogues key mechanistic pathways through which repurposed agents exert anticancer activity. The review's acknowledgement of translational barriers — including intellectual property limitations, dose optimisation challenges, and the absence of predictive biomarkers — reflects intellectual rigour. However, clinicians should interpret this paper's conclusions with caution. It is a narrative review, not a systematic review or meta-analysis, and lacks a reproducible search strategy, pre-specified inclusion criteria, risk of bias assessment, or quantitative evidence synthesis. No patient-centred clinical outcomes are systematically reported. The evidence base presented is insufficient to justify changes to clinical practice. This paper is best used as an educational overview and hypothesis-generating framework for researchers designing prospective repurposing trials. Senior clinicians seeking evidence to guide prescribing decisions should look to prospective RCTs and Cochrane-level systematic reviews of specific repurposed agents in defined tumour types.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported
Effect Size: Not applicable — no quantitative effect sizes reported; this is a narrative review without meta-analytic synthesis
Primary Outcome: Narrative synthesis of computational and experimental drug repurposing methodologies and their application to oncology, including identification of anticancer mechanisms across key signalling pathways
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not applicable — no NNT, sensitivity, specificity, or hazard ratios reported; the review does not synthesise clinical trial data in a quantitative format
Confidence Interval: Not reported — no statistical analysis performed
Clinical Application
Computational repurposing strategies described (molecular docking, machine learning, network modelling) are feasible in well-resourced academic and pharmaceutical research settings. High-throughput screening and patient-derived organoid platforms require significant infrastructure investment. Clinical translation of repurposed agents faces real-world barriers including off-label prescribing regulations, dose optimisation requirements, and limited commercial incentives due to intellectual property constraints on generic drugs. In Australia, drug repurposing in oncology intersects with several regulatory and funding frameworks. The TGA regulates off-label use of repurposed agents, and prescribers must navigate informed consent obligations for non-approved indications. The PBS does not currently fund most repurposed non-oncology drugs for cancer indications, creating access inequities. The RACGP and COSA (Clinical Oncology Society of Australia) have not issued specific guidelines on repurposing frameworks. The ReDO (Repurposing Drugs in Oncology) project and CARE (Cancer Adjuvant Research and Education) trial platform in Australia represent relevant domestic initiatives. Metformin, statins, aspirin, and ivermectin — commonly discussed repurposing candidates — are PBS-listed for their primary indications but require prospective RCT evidence before oncology-specific PBS listing could be considered. Australian researchers at institutions such as the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and WEHI are active in translational repurposing research, providing domestic relevance to the computational and mechanistic frameworks described. Broadly applicable to oncology patients across tumour types where repurposed agents targeting PI3K/AKT/mTOR, MAPK/ERK, Wnt/β-catenin, redox, and DNA damage response pathways are under investigation. Most directly relevant to oncologists, medical researchers, and translational scientists evaluating repurposing candidates in early-phase clinical trials or preclinical pipelines. Not directly applicable to individual patient management decisions without supporting RCT-level evidence.
Abstract
Drug repurposing, the identification of new therapeutic applications for existing drugs, has emerged as a pragmatic and cost-efficient strategy to accelerate oncology drug discovery. Faced with rising development costs, protracted timelines, and high attrition rates associated with traditional de novo drug development, repurposing leverages known pharmacokinetics, safety profiles, and manufacturing processes to expedite clinical translation. This review synthesizes current advances in computational and experimental methodologies and mechanistic insights that drive drug repurposing for cancer therapy. In silico strategies, including molecular docking, machine learning, transcriptomic-proteomic signature reversal, and network-based modeling, have enabled rapid identification of repurposable agents by mining multi-omics and historical pharmacological data. Experimental pipelines spanning high-throughput screening, phenotypic assays, biochemical validations, and functional animal models remain essential to establish efficacy and delineate mechanisms of action. Notably, repurposed drugs exhibit anticancer activity by modulating key pathways, including phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Ak strain transforming/mechanistic target of rapamycin, mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase, wingless-related integration site/β-catenin signaling, as well as redox homeostasis and DNA response. Despite their promise, repurposed candidates face barriers including limited intellectual property protections, dose optimization challenges, and regulatory uncertainty. Moreover, clinical translation is often hindered by insufficient mechanistic understanding and a lack of predictive biomarkers. Integration of multi-omics datasets, explainable artificial intelligence, patient-derived organoids, and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-based genetic screens now offers unprecedented precision in identifying context-specific drug effects and synthetic lethal interactions. With cancer causing one in six global deaths and marked by therapeutic resistance and molecular heterogeneity, drug repurposing provides a scalable solution. This approach bridged preclinical insight with clinical application, potentially transforming cancer therapeutics through rational, data-driven innovation.
References
- 1.Baskar, S., & Prasad, N. R. (2026). Drug repurposing in oncology: Bridging computational discovery to clinical application. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70429
Related Research
Cancer medicine
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1 Aug 2026
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
User perceptions of machine learning models as decision support for colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team conferences (AID-SIM-2): a qualitative simulation study.
1 Aug 2026
Journal of breast imaging
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
30 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service