Drug Clearance and Dosing During CytoSorb Hemoadsorption: A Systematic Review
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Critically ill patients and cardiac surgery patients undergoing CytoSorb (CS) hemoadsorption therapy, including those with drug overdose; also benchtop and animal models |
| I — Intervention | CytoSorb hemoadsorption (extracorporeal cytokine adsorption device) used concurrently with pharmacological agents across multiple therapeutic classes |
| C — Comparator | No explicit comparator; studies assess drug pharmacokinetics with versus without CS, or pre- versus post-CS drug concentrations |
| O — Outcomes | Drug removal rates (low <30%, moderate 30–60%, high >60%), relative increase in clearance attributable to CS, and derived dosing recommendations for concomitant medications |
Bottom Line
This systematic review from a manufacturer-affiliated authorship team attempts to synthesise pharmacokinetic evidence on drug removal during CytoSorb hemoadsorption across multiple drug classes. While it addresses a clinically relevant question for intensivists managing complex extracorporeal therapy, the methodological quality is substantially compromised. The search strategy is non-comprehensive, no formal risk of bias assessment was performed, no GRADE certainty ratings were applied, and no patient-centred clinical outcomes were evaluated. The evidence base is predominantly in vitro and observational, and the dosing recommendations generated are expert opinion rather than evidence-based guidance. Most critically, the lead author and several co-authors are affiliated with the device manufacturer (CytoSorbents Europe GmbH), representing a significant conflict of interest that undermines confidence in the conclusions. The review is best regarded as a useful pharmacokinetic reference compendium and hypothesis-generating document rather than a practice-changing systematic review. Clinicians using CytoSorb should apply therapeutic drug monitoring for susceptible agents — particularly anti-infectives and immunosuppressants — and await independent, high-quality pharmacokinetic studies before adopting the dosing recommendations as clinical standards.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported
Effect Size: Not reported as a pooled effect size; results presented as categorical drug removal classifications across analgesics, antiarrhythmics, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, antihypertensives, anti-infectives, antithrombotics, anxiolytics, and immunosuppressants
Primary Outcome: Drug removal during CytoSorb hemoadsorption, categorised by removal rate (low <30%, moderate 30–60%, high >60%) and relative clearance increase attributable to CS (negligible <25%, low 25–100%, moderate 100–400%, high >400%) across multiple drug classes
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not applicable; no NNT, sensitivity/specificity, or hazard ratios reported. Dosing recommendations are qualitative and expert-derived rather than statistically derived
Confidence Interval: Not reported
Clinical Application
CytoSorb hemoadsorption is available in specialised ICU and cardiac surgery centres. The practical dosing guidance provided may assist intensivists and clinical pharmacists in managing drug therapy during CS therapy, but should be applied with caution given the low certainty of the underlying evidence. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is strongly advisable for drugs with known susceptibility to CS removal. CytoSorb is not currently listed on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) as a standard reimbursed device, and its use in Australia remains largely confined to specialist centres and compassionate/investigational contexts. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has not issued specific guidance on CytoSorb use. The PBS does not subsidise CytoSorb therapy. RACGP and CICM (College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand) guidelines do not currently endorse routine CS use. Australian intensivists should be aware that anti-infective dosing — particularly for beta-lactams, vancomycin, and antifungals — may be affected during CS therapy, and TDM-guided dosing is recommended. The antithrombotic removal application (e.g., for perioperative bleeding risk reduction) requires further evaluation before adoption in Australian cardiac surgical practice. Critically ill adult patients in ICU or cardiac surgery settings receiving CytoSorb hemoadsorption concurrently with pharmacological therapy, and patients with drug overdose where CS is used for intentional drug removal. Paediatric data are very limited (one paediatric ICU affiliation noted).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: CytoSorb (CS) hemoadsorption is increasingly used in critical care and cardiac surgery to remove inflammatory mediators and select drugs. This systematic review aimed to summarize available evidence on intentional drug removal as well as unintentional drug removal during CS therapy. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, congress abstracts, and CytoSorbents online literature database. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies included benchtop, animal, and human pharmacokinetic investigations of drug removal during CS therapy as well as clinical reports describing CS use for drug overdose. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from the eligible studies were extracted independently by two authors into Microsoft Excel. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data were identified for drugs across multiple therapeutic classes, including analgesics, antiarrhythmics, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, antihypertensives, anti-infectives, antithrombotics, anxiolytics, and immunosuppressants. Drugs were categorized into low (< 30%), moderate (30-60%), or high (> 60%) removal rate, or by the relative increase in clearance attributable to CS: negligible (< 25%), low (25-100%), moderate (100-400%), or high (> 400%). Based on the assembled data and considering drug-, patient-, and circuit-specific factors, general dosing recommendations for concomitant medications were developed. CONCLUSIONS: CS therapy can alter drug concentrations for select agents with variable clinical relevance. CS can reduce perioperative bleeding risk through antithrombotic removal and treat certain drug overdoses. Unintentional drug removal during CS therapy may occur and practical guidance is provided for drugs with known susceptibility to removal.
References
- 1.Klaus, T., Honoré, P. M., Bottari, G., De Rosa, S., Kindgen-Milles, D., Schneider, A., Marczin, N., Adamson, H., Scheier, J., Deliargyris, E. N., & Nolin, T. D. (2026). Drug clearance and dosing during CytoSorb hemoadsorption: A systematic review. Critical Care Explorations. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001444
Related Research
Journal of critical care
Artificial intelligence and computerized decision support in adult intensive care: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
3 Aug 2026
Current opinion in critical care
Smart feeding: the role of artificial intelligence and integrated nutrition platforms in the ICU
2 Aug 2026
Brain and behavior
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Poor Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
1 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service