Research AppraisalSystematic Review

Does osteogenesis imperfecta predispose infants to metaphyseal fractures? A systematic review.

BMJ paediatrics openRiley, Ella, Paddock, Michael, Elgarwany, Sara et al.8 Apr 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

50CEBM
Evidence: WeakSystematic Review

PICO Framework

P — PopulationChildren with osteogenesis imperfecta less than 2 years of age
I — InterventionPresence of osteogenesis imperfecta
C — ComparatorNot explicitly defined (implied comparison to general population or children without OI)
O — OutcomesPrevalence of metaphyseal fractures

Bottom Line

This systematic review found extremely limited evidence that osteogenesis imperfecta predisposes infants to metaphyseal fractures. Only four studies met inclusion criteria, providing insufficient data to establish a clear association. The authors appropriately conclude that OI and child abuse are not mutually exclusive diagnoses. Clinicians should continue to consider physical abuse in all infants and young children presenting with metaphyseal fractures, even when OI is confirmed. The review highlights a significant evidence gap requiring larger, well-designed studies. Current child protection protocols should remain unchanged based on this limited evidence. The findings support maintaining a high index of suspicion for non-accidental trauma while pursuing appropriate genetic and metabolic investigations for suspected bone disorders.

Evidence: Weak

Key Findings

  • Effect Size: Not quantified - descriptive results only

  • Primary Outcome: Prevalence of metaphyseal fractures in children with OI under 2 years

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: One study reported 4/41 children (9.8%) with OI had metaphyseal fractures

  • Confidence Interval: Not provided

Clinical Application

Findings support current practice of maintaining high index of suspicion for abuse even in children with confirmed OI Relevant to Australian paediatric practice, aligns with RACGP guidelines on child protection and mandatory reporting requirements Paediatric patients under 2 years with suspected or confirmed osteogenesis imperfecta presenting with metaphyseal fractures

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The notion that osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) predisposes children to metaphyseal fractures is controversial. This review aimed to ascertain the prevalence of metaphyseal fractures in children with OI less than 2 years of age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting metaphyseal fractures in children with OI less than 2 years of age. Articles not retrievable, not published in English, or where 'metaphyseal' fracture was not defined/illustrated, were excluded. Article quality was independently assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and Case Reports tools. RESULTS: Of 298 retrieved abstracts, 82 were duplicates: 216 articles were screened by title and abstract, excluding 186. Hand search of the remaining 30 articles identified two further articles. Only four articles were included: (1) 4/41 children with OI aged between 1 day and 3 years with 'metaphyseal' fractures; (2) a case series including a 16-month-old boy with three 'metaphyseal' fractures. Abuse concerns remained despite a type IV OI diagnosis (not genetically confirmed); (3) a 7-month-old girl with two 'corner' fractures suspected to have OI and to have been abused; and (4) a pair of siblings with 'metaphyseal' fractures and type XI OI (FKBP10 mutation). CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence that OI predisposes infants and young children to metaphyseal fractures. The two diagnoses are not mutually exclusive and until further large studies are conducted, physical abuse should always be considered in infants and young children with metaphyseal fractures, even in those with confirmed OI.

References

  1. 1.Riley, E., Paddock, M., Elgarwany, S., Fairhurst, J., Halliday, K., Jeanes, A., Johnson, K., & Offiah, A. C. (2026). Does osteogenesis imperfecta predispose infants to metaphyseal fractures? A systematic review. BMJ Paediatrics Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003755
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service