Digital Leadership Scale for Clinical Nurses: Development and Validation of an Instrument
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Clinical nurses working across various healthcare institutions in South Korea |
| I — Intervention | Development and psychometric validation of the Digital Leadership Scale for Clinical Nurses (DLS-CN), a 29-item self-report instrument |
| C — Comparator | Convergent validity assessed against the Nursing Informatics Competency Scale and the Self-Leadership Scale; no active comparator intervention |
| O — Outcomes | Psychometric properties including construct validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis), content validity (content validity index), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), convergent validity (Pearson correlation), and item discrimination |
Bottom Line
Lee and Jung present a methodologically sound instrument development study producing the Digital Leadership Scale for Clinical Nurses (DLS-CN) — a 29-item, four-factor tool assessing digital technology use, digital safety management, digital collaboration, and organisational influence. The scale demonstrates strong internal consistency (α=0.95) and convergent validity against nursing informatics and self-leadership measures. The multistep development process, including expert panel review and cognitive interviewing, is rigorous. However, several psychometric gaps warrant caution: discriminant validity is absent despite very high convergent correlations that suggest potential construct overlap; CFA fit statistics are unreported; and test-retest reliability has not been established. The instrument was developed and validated exclusively in South Korean nurses, limiting direct transferability to Australian or other Western healthcare settings without cross-cultural adaptation. For Australian nurse educators, administrators, and researchers, the DLS-CN represents a promising framework for conceptualising digital leadership competencies, but independent validation in the Australian context — aligned with the National Digital Health Strategy — is needed before routine clinical or workforce planning application. The study is rated Moderate in evidence quality.
Key Findings
P Value: p<0.001 for both convergent validity correlations
Effect Size: Four factors explained 56.9% of total variance; convergent validity correlations: r=0.82 with Nursing Informatics Competency Scale; r=0.83 with Self-Leadership Scale
Primary Outcome: Development and validation of a 29-item, four-factor Digital Leadership Scale for Clinical Nurses (DLS-CN) with domains: (1) ability to use digital technology, (2) digital safety management, (3) digital collaboration mindset, and (4) organisational influence
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Cronbach's alpha=0.95 (overall internal consistency); individual domain alphas not reported in abstract; CFA fit indices not reported in abstract
Confidence Interval: Not reported
Clinical Application
The 29-item scale is of practical length for clinical administration and requires no specialised equipment. It can be administered as a paper-based or electronic survey. Scoring and interpretation would require access to the full published instrument and normative data. Feasibility in non-Korean settings requires cross-cultural adaptation. Australia's National Digital Health Strategy 2023–2028, led by the Australian Digital Health Agency (ADHA), explicitly identifies digital health workforce capability as a priority. The Australian College of Nursing and ANMF have identified digital literacy as an emerging competency domain. The DLS-CN could theoretically inform nursing workforce digital capability assessments aligned with these frameworks. However, direct application requires cross-cultural adaptation and re-validation in the Australian context, given differences in healthcare system structure, digital infrastructure (e.g., My Health Record), and nursing scope of practice. The TGA and PBS are not directly relevant to this instrument development study. RACGP digital health guidelines focus on general practice rather than hospital nursing, but the broader principle of digital leadership competency assessment is transferable. Clinical nurses in hospital and healthcare institution settings, particularly those involved in digital health implementation, nursing informatics, or leadership development programmes
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The rapid advancement of digital technologies, combined with the evolving complexity of health care environments, has introduced a new paradigm in nursing practice. Clinical nurses are now required not only to deliver safe and effective patient care but also to demonstrate competencies in digital literacy and innovation. Among these emerging competencies, digital leadership has become a critical attribute-enabling nurses to lead digital transformation, ensure patient safety, enhance care quality, and support system-level change within health care organizations. Despite its increasing relevance, there is a notable absence of validated measurement tools tailored to assess digital leadership in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and psychometrically validate a Digital Leadership Scale for Clinical Nurses (DLS-CN) to systematically evaluate the digital leadership capabilities of nurses working in clinical settings. METHODS: The scale development process followed a rigorous multistep procedure. Initial items were derived from previous qualitative research involving a literature review and in-depth interviews, complemented by an additional literature review conducted in this study. The content validity of 38 preliminary items was evaluated by 9 experts over 2 rounds. A pilot test was conducted with 30 nurses, followed by cognitive interviews with 5 nurses to refine item clarity and relevance. The final set of items was administered to 446 clinical nurses across various health care institutions. Data were randomly split for exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Additional analyses were conducted to evaluate item discrimination, convergent validity, and internal consistency using IBM SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 23.0. RESULTS: The finalized DLS-CN consists of 29 items grouped under four domains: (1) ability to use digital technology, (2) digital safety management, (3) digital collaboration mindset, and (4) organizational influence. These 4 factors explained 56.9% of the total variance. The scale showed strong internal consistency (Cronbach α=0.95). Convergent validity was demonstrated through strong positive correlations with the Nursing Informatics Competency Scale (Pearson correlation coefficient r=0.82; P<.001) and the Self-Leadership Scale (Pearson correlation coefficient r=0.83; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The DLS-CN is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring digital leadership among clinical nurses. It offers a practical tool for educators, administrators, and researchers to assess and enhance digital leadership capabilities-ultimately supporting the digital transformation of health care systems.
References
- 1.Lee, J.-H., & Jung, S.-Y. (2026). Digital Leadership Scale for Clinical Nurses: Development and Validation of an Instrument. JMIR Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12587
Related Research
Scandinavian journal of pain
Multimodal deep learning fusion for automatic pain detection in cancer patients
26 July 2026
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
A machine learning approach to profiling anxiety risk among cancer patients on treatment
19 July 2026
Vaccine
Instruments for measuring parents' vaccine hesitancy towards their children based on the COSMIN guidelines: A systematic review
12 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service