Research Appraisalother

Diffuse splenic calcifications in systemic lupus erythematosus: a case-based review

Rheumatology internationalTack, Celine, Stuer, Ann, Vulsteke, Jean-Baptiste23 May 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

70CEBM
Evidence: Moderateother

PICO Framework

P — PopulationPatients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) presenting with splenic calcifications
I — InterventionCase identification and characterization of splenic calcifications
C — ComparatorNot applicable (descriptive case series)
O — OutcomesClinical characteristics, imaging patterns, serological profiles, and disease progression of splenic calcifications in SLE

Bottom Line

This systematic case review identifies splenic calcifications as a rare but characteristic manifestation of SLE, occurring in a distinctive pattern of diffuse, small calcifications visible on CT imaging. While no specific serological or clinical phenotype was identified, the imaging pattern appears consistent across cases. Importantly, splenic calcifications may represent an early or presenting feature of SLE, suggesting that incidental detection should prompt consideration of autoimmune disease. The calcifications are typically stable but may progress during disease flares, occasionally leading to functional autosplenectomy. For Australian clinicians, this finding adds to the diagnostic toolkit for SLE evaluation, particularly in patients presenting with fever and splenomegaly. However, the case series methodology limits the strength of recommendations, and larger prospective studies would be valuable to establish prevalence and clinical significance.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • Effect Size: Not applicable (descriptive study)

  • Primary Outcome: Characteristic imaging pattern of diffuse, small, round-to-rod-shaped splenic calcifications in SLE

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: 30 cases identified from systematic literature review, representing rare but recognizable SLE manifestation

Clinical Application

High feasibility - relies on standard CT imaging already used in clinical practice Relevant to Australian rheumatology practice; supports early SLE recognition which may improve outcomes and reduce healthcare costs through timely diagnosis and treatment initiation Rheumatologists, radiologists, and internists evaluating patients with unexplained splenic calcifications or suspected autoimmune disease

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multi-organ autoimmune disease with a wide spectrum of splenic manifestations. In recent literature, splenic calcifications have increasingly been recognized as a rare manifestation of SLE. We describe a patient presenting with fever in whom abdominal imaging revealed splenomegaly with diffuse splenic microcalcifications, prompting further diagnostic evaluation that ultimately led to the diagnosis of SLE. To contextualize this finding, we performed a systematic case-based literature review and identified 29 previously reported cases, resulting in a total of 30 cases including our own. Across reported cases, no distinct serological or clinical phenotype could be identified. However, a characteristic imaging pattern emerged, predominantly consisting of diffuse, small, round-to-rod-shaped splenic calcifications. When longitudinal data were available, calcifications were usually stable, although progression was reported in association with disease flares, sometimes evolving to functional autosplenectomy. This case illustrates that splenic calcifications may represent an early or presenting manifestation of SLE and that an incidental detection should prompt consideration of autoimmune disease in the broad differential diagnosis. By synthesizing previously scattered reports, this review provides an updated overview to support clinical interpretation and awareness.

References

  1. 1.Tack, C., Stuer, A., & Vulsteke, J. B. (2026). Diffuse splenic calcifications in systemic lupus erythematosus: a case-based review. Rheumatology International. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07420.x
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service