Research Appraisalother

Development of Virtual Mental Health Stepped Care Service for a Heart Failure Remote Management Program: Qualitative Descriptive Study

JMIR formative researchShah, Amika, Shahil-Feroz, Anam, Sheehan, Kathleen A et al.14 Apr 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

85CEBM
Evidence: Moderateother

PICO Framework

P — PopulationPeople living with heart failure, clinicians, and researchers from a heart failure remote patient management program
I — InterventionStakeholder consultation through semi-structured interviews to inform service design
C — ComparatorNot applicable (qualitative descriptive study)
O — OutcomesIdentification of strategies and requirements for designing a virtual mental health stepped care service

Bottom Line

This stakeholder-informed qualitative study provides valuable insights for implementing virtual mental health services in heart failure care. The research identified six key themes for service design, emphasizing collective distress identification, referral-based workflows, utilization of existing mental health resources, and patient choice. The findings address a critical implementation gap, as depression affects up to 40% of heart failure patients yet remains undertreated. The proposed stepped care model builds on organizational strengths while reducing treatment burden, making it potentially feasible for Australian healthcare settings. However, the study lacks detail on ethical considerations and researcher reflexivity. While the service design approach is methodologically sound, future evaluation of acceptability and effectiveness is needed. The research contributes meaningfully to the limited literature on stepped care implementation in cardiovascular settings and provides a practical framework for integrating digital mental health interventions into routine heart failure management.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not applicable - qualitative study

  • Effect Size: Not applicable - qualitative study

  • Primary Outcome: Six themes identified: 4 requirements (collective distress identification, referral-based approach, existing mental health resources, patient choice) and 2 principles (organizational strengths, reduced treatment burden)

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: 22 participants interviewed (13 heart failure patients, 9 clinicians/researchers)

  • Confidence Interval: Not applicable - qualitative study

Clinical Application

High feasibility given focus on existing resources and organizational strengths, though resource limitations may affect implementation quality Highly relevant to Australian telehealth initiatives, Medicare Benefits Schedule telehealth items, and National Heart Foundation guidelines for integrated care Heart failure patients with depression in remote monitoring programs, particularly relevant to integrated care models

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depression is highly prevalent yet undertreated among people living with heart failure, indicating barriers to mental health services. Although various digital mental health interventions have been developed to detect, treat, and manage depression in this population, these interventions have seen limited integration into clinical care and a lack of implementation research. Stepped care is a service innovation that may promote the implementation of these technologies into clinical settings, but few studies have examined how these services are designed in clinical settings. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify strategies to address health system barriers to accessing mental health care from the perspective of people living with heart failure, clinicians, and researchers, and to incorporate these strategies into the design of a virtual mental health stepped care service within a heart failure remote management program. METHODS: A qualitative description study was conducted using purposive recruitment of people living with heart failure, clinicians, and researchers from a heart failure remote patient management program. As part of a service design approach, semistructured interviews explored potential strategies to address barriers to accessing mental health services. Two researchers coded the data descriptively and constructed themes to guide the development of a virtual stepped care service. RESULTS: A total of 22 participants were interviewed, comprising 13 people living with heart failure and 9 clinicians and researchers. Six themes were identified, comprising 4 requirements and 2 foundational principles. The requirements were to (1) adopt a collective approach to identify distress across methods, people, and time points; (2) maintain a referral-based approach; (3) rely on existing mental health human resources; and (4) offer patient choice among various mental health care options. These requirements were supported by two principles: (1) building on organizational strengths and (2) reducing treatment burden. Based on these findings, a virtual stepped care service was developed, incorporating a depression screening module, referral-based workflows, and, where clinically appropriate, patient choice in treatment selection. CONCLUSIONS: The stakeholder-informed design of this virtual stepped care service contributes to the limited literature on stepped care service design and demonstrates how such models can be tailored to their intended contexts. Although each component was designed to address health system barriers to mental health care for people living with heart failure, resource limitations may constrain the balance between feasibility and quality of care. Future research should evaluate the acceptability of this model among people living with heart failure and clinicians.

References

  1. 1.Shah, A., Shahil-Feroz, A., Sheehan, K. A., Wright, S., Nolan, R. P., Strudwick, G., Sockalingam, S., & Seto, E. (2026). Development of Virtual Mental Health Stepped Care Service for a Heart Failure Remote Management Program: Qualitative Descriptive Study. JMIR Formative Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.07.004
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service