Development and Validation of a SHAP-Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Stroke Risk Prediction Using Circulating MicroRNA Biomarkers
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Adults with and without stroke (1,785 serum samples: 173 stroke patients, 1,612 controls) |
| I — Intervention | Machine learning model using circulating microRNA biomarkers |
| C — Comparator | Clinical assessment without microRNA testing |
| O — Outcomes | Stroke prediction accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and model interpretability |
Bottom Line
This study develops a machine learning model using circulating microRNAs to predict stroke risk, achieving high accuracy in the development dataset. However, the clinical utility remains uncertain due to several methodological limitations. The external validation involved only 10 samples, raising questions about generalizability. The perfect AUC of 1.0 in the development cohort suggests possible overfitting. While the SHAP analysis provides valuable interpretability insights, the lack of confidence intervals, blinding, and detailed clinical characterisation limits confidence in the results. The identified miRNA signatures show promise but require larger, prospective validation studies with diverse populations before clinical implementation. Australian clinicians should await more robust validation data before considering this approach for routine stroke risk assessment.
Key Findings
P Value: Not specified for diagnostic performance
Effect Size: SVM model accuracy 99.83% (development), 80% (validation)
Primary Outcome: Stroke prediction using miRNA biomarkers
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Sensitivity 80%, Specificity 80% in validation cohort
Confidence Interval: Not reported
Clinical Application
Requires specialised miRNA analysis capabilities, currently limited to research settings Would require TGA approval for clinical use; not currently covered by PBS; potential integration with RACGP stroke risk assessment guidelines Adults at risk of stroke, though population characteristics poorly defined
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Stroke remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as promising non-invasive biomarkers for cardiovascular disease diagnosis and risk stratification. However, their integration into predictive models remains limited by challenges in feature selection, model robustness, and interpretability. This study aims to develop an interpretable machine learning framework for predicting stroke incidence using serum miRNA signatures. METHODS: We analyzed serum miRNA expression profiles from 1,785 human samples (173 stroke patients and 1,612 non-stroke controls) obtained from the GEO dataset GSE117064. Differential expression analysis was performed to identify significantly dysregulated miRNAs using linear modeling and empirical Bayes moderation. LASSO logistic regression was then applied to select predictive miRNA features. Five supervised machine learning classifiers-logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), random forest, XGBoost, and k-nearest neighbors-were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation. The best-performing model (SVM) was further interpreted using Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to assess individual miRNA contributions to prediction. To validate the robustness and clinical generalizability of the identified signatures, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) were performed on independent sets of serum samples. The pre-trained SVM model was applied to the NGS data to verify its classification performance in an external cohort. RESULTS: A total of 604 miRNAs were differentially expressed between stroke and non-stroke groups, including 206 downregulated and 398 upregulated candidates. LASSO regression identified 66 non-zero-coefficient miRNAs with potential predictive value. Among the classifiers tested, the SVM model achieved the highest average accuracy of 0.9983 and perfect AUC (1.0000), demonstrating superior performance and stability. SHAP analysis revealed that a subset of miRNAs, including hsa-miR-3648, hsa-miR-1290, and hsa-miR-6765-3p, had the greatest impact on classification outcomes, providing mechanistic insights and enhancing model interpretability. qPCR results preliminarily supported the differential expression patterns of key miRNAs. Furthermore, NGS analysis of an independent validation cohort (n = 10) demonstrated distinct hierarchical clustering of the selected biomarkers. The pre-trained SVM model preliminarily supported its cross-platform validity by classifying these external samples with an overall accuracy of 80% (sensitivity 80%, specificity 80%), suggesting the potential generalizability of the identified miRNA panel across different quantification platforms. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the utility of integrating differential expression analysis, regularized feature selection, and machine learning with SHAP-based interpretation to identify and validate serum miRNA signatures predictive of stroke. The successful external validation using NGS highlights the robustness of the identified biomarkers and their potential for cross-platform application. The results provide a transparent, data-driven framework for biomarker discovery in clinical risk prediction and support the development of non-invasive diagnostic tools for stroke detection.
References
- 1.Yao, Q., Sun, B., Shen, J., Wang, C., Yao, W., & Chen, Y. (2026). Development and Validation of a SHAP-Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Stroke Risk Prediction Using Circulating MicroRNA Biomarkers. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1111/sji.13354
Related Research
Sleep medicine reviews
Machine and deep learning in REM sleep behavior disorder: a scoping review and analysis of reporting quality
3 Aug 2026
Neurological research
Federated deep learning model for epilepsy seizure detection using electroencephalogram (EEG) signal
2 Aug 2026
Journal of psychiatric research
Systematic review of machine learning and deep learning models for EEG-based detection of depression.
2 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service