Research Appraisalobservational

Determinants of Digital Health Literacy Among Patients With Serious Mental Illness: Cross-Sectional Survey

JMIR mental healthChou, Yi-Ju, Chiang, Kai-Jo, Huang, Hsin et al.15 Apr 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

80CEBM
Evidence: Moderateobservational

PICO Framework

P — PopulationAdults with serious mental illness recruited from psychiatric clinics, day-care centers, and halfway houses in Taipei, Taiwan (n=255)
I — InterventionNot applicable (observational study)
C — ComparatorNot applicable (cross-sectional design examining associations)
O — OutcomesDigital health literacy levels measured by eHealth Literacy Scale, with secondary measures of attitudes toward computers/internet and mobile device proficiency

Bottom Line

This cross-sectional study of 255 patients with serious mental illness in Taiwan found that while 83.5% owned digital devices, digital health literacy varied considerably. Key barriers included perceived difficulty using digital tools and distrust in online health information, while mobile device proficiency and self-efficacy were positive predictors. The findings highlight a critical gap between device ownership and effective use of digital health resources in this vulnerable population. For Australian clinicians, this suggests that simply providing digital health tools to patients with serious mental illness may be insufficient without accompanying digital literacy support. Mental health services should consider implementing structured digital skills training and confidence-building programs as part of comprehensive care plans. The study's convenience sampling and geographic limitation to Taiwan somewhat restrict direct applicability, but the core findings align with clinical observations in similar populations globally.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: Perceived difficulty P<0.001; Self-efficacy P=0.01; Mobile proficiency P=0.04; Distrust P=0.04

  • Effect Size: Perceived difficulty: B=-1.533; Mobile proficiency: B=0.144; Self-efficacy: B=1.777; Distrust: B=-0.986

  • Primary Outcome: Digital health literacy scores varied significantly among participants with serious mental illness

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: 83.5% of participants owned at least one digital device, indicating high device access despite literacy challenges

  • Confidence Interval: Perceived difficulty: 95% CI -2.350 to -0.717; Self-efficacy: 95% CI 0.376-3.177

Clinical Application

Findings suggest need for structured digital literacy programs integrated into mental health services, which is feasible in Australian community mental health settings Relevant to Australian mental health services under NDIS and PHN frameworks; could inform digital mental health initiatives and telehealth programs supported by Medicare Adults with serious mental illness receiving community-based psychiatric care, particularly those using digital health services

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individuals with serious mental illness increasingly use digital devices and the internet to access health information and services but often face challenges when navigating digital tools, which may limit the benefits they receive from online health resources and digital health care services. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess digital health literacy among individuals with serious mental illness and identify factors influencing this literacy. METHODS: Participants were recruited, using convenience sampling, from 2 psychiatric clinics, 1 day-care center, and 4 halfway houses in Taipei, Taiwan, between May 2024 and February 2025. Self-reported data were collected using a survey that incorporated the eHealth Literacy Scale, the Attitudes Toward Computer/Internet Questionnaire, and the Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire. Generalized linear modeling was applied to identify factors associated with digital health literacy. RESULTS: Among 255 participants included in the analysis, 83.5% (n=213) reported owning at least 1 digital device. Digital health literacy was significantly lower among individuals who reported greater perceived difficulty in using digital tools (B=-1.533, 95% CI -2.350 to -0.717; P<.001) and higher distrust in online information (B=-0.986, 95% CI -1.916 to -0.056; P=.04). By contrast, greater mobile device proficiency (B=0.144, 95% CI 0.008-0.281; P=.04) and self-efficacy (B=1.777, 95% CI 0.376-3.177; P=.01) were positively associated with digital health literacy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite widespread device ownership, digital health literacy was varied and generally suboptimal among patients with serious mental illness. Perceived difficulty and distrust emerged as major barriers; proficiency and self-efficacy facilitated higher literacy. These findings highlight the need for mental health professionals to integrate tailored digital skills training, confidence-building strategies, and ongoing support into digital health interventions for individuals with serious mental illnesses.

References

  1. 1.Chou, Y. J., Chiang, K. J., Huang, H., Chang, H. A., Hung, Y. L., & Tzeng, W. C. (2026). Determinants of Digital Health Literacy Among Patients With Serious Mental Illness: Cross-Sectional Survey. JMIR Mental Health, 13, e88700. https://doi.org/10.2196/88700
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service