Research Appraisalother

Context-Aware Sentence Classification of Radiology Reports Using Synthetic Data: Development and Validation Study

Journal of medical Internet researchKikuchi, Tomohiro, Yamagishi, Yosuke, Yamamoto, Kohei et al.10 Apr 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

85CEBM
Evidence: Moderateother

PICO Framework

P — PopulationJapanese radiology reports from 7 institutions (n=280 real-world reports, 3477 sentences)
I — InterventionContext-aware sentence classification models trained entirely on synthetic data generated by GPT-4.1
C — ComparatorMultiple model architectures (Qwen3, Llama 3.2, BERT-base Japanese, JMedRoBERTa-base, ModernBERT-Ja-130M)
O — OutcomesAccuracy, macro-averaged F1 score, positive predictive value for positive findings (PPV_1), parsing error rates

Bottom Line

This development and validation study demonstrates that context-aware sentence classification models for radiology reports can be trained using entirely synthetic data, achieving clinically relevant performance for positive finding detection (PPV 95.2-95.7%). While overall accuracy decreased from synthetic testing (93.8-95.1%) to real-world validation (78.3-81.3%), the stability of positive predictive value suggests robust clinical utility for identifying significant findings. The approach addresses privacy concerns and reduces manual annotation requirements, though parsing errors (0.55-7.48%) and performance degradation on real-world data remain limitations. For Australian radiologists, this methodology could inform development of English-language automated report structuring systems, potentially improving workflow efficiency and data utilisation while maintaining patient privacy. However, local validation would be essential before clinical implementation.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not reported

  • Effect Size: Performance degradation from synthetic (0.938-0.951) to real-world validation (0.783-0.813)

  • Primary Outcome: Model accuracy on external validation: 0.783-0.813

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: PPV_1 for positive findings: 0.952-0.957 (stable across datasets)

  • Confidence Interval: Not reported

Clinical Application

Moderate - requires technical expertise and institutional IT infrastructure Limited direct applicability due to language specificity; methodology could inform English-language implementations in Australian radiology departments Radiology departments implementing automated report structuring systems

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Automated structuring of radiology reports is essential for data utilization and the development of medical artificial intelligence models. However, manual annotation by experts is labor-intensive, and processing real clinical data through commercial large language models (LLMs) presents significant privacy risks. These challenges are particularly pronounced for non-English languages like Japanese, where specialized medical corpora are scarce. While synthetic data generation offers a potential privacy-preserving alternative, its effectiveness in capturing complex clinical nuances-such as negation and contextual dependencies-to train robust classification models without any real-world training data has not been fully established. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a context-aware sentence classification model for Japanese radiology reports using an entirely synthetic training pipeline, thereby eliminating reliance on real-world clinical data during the development phase. Furthermore, we sought to evaluate the generalizability of this approach by validating the model's performance on diverse, multi-institutional, real-world reports. METHODS: Japanese radiology reports (n=3104) were generated using GPT-4.1 and automatically annotated at the sentence level into 4 categories (background, positive finding, negative finding, and continuation) using GPT-4.1-mini. The synthetic data were partitioned into training (n=2670), validation (n=334), and test (n=100) sets. We fine-tuned several models, including lightweight local LLMs (Qwen3 and Llama 3.2 series) using low-rank adaptation and Japanese text classification models (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers [BERT]-base Japanese v3, Japanese Medical Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach [JMedRoBERTa]-base, and ModernBERT-Ja-130M). External validation was performed using 280 real-world reports (3477 sentences) from 7 institutions in the Japan Medical Image Database, with ground-truth labels established by board-certified radiologists. Evaluation metrics included accuracy, macro-averaged F1 (macro F1) score, and positive predictive value for positive findings (PPV_1). RESULTS: All models achieved high performance on the synthetic test set (accuracy: 0.938-0.951; macro F1-score: 0.924-0.940). Overall performance declined on the external validation dataset (accuracy: 0.783-0.813; macro F1-score: 0.761-0.790), reflecting distributional differences between synthetic and real-world reports; however, PPV_1 remained stable and high across datasets (eg, 0.957 on the synthetic test set vs 0.952 on the external validation dataset for Qwen3 [4B]). Parsing errors occurred in LLM-based approaches (19-260 sentences, 0.55%-7.48% in the external dataset). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of developing context-aware sentence classification models for Japanese radiology reports using a training pipeline based entirely on synthetic data. The stability of PPV_1 indicates that the models successfully captured the essential clinical terminology and linguistic patterns required to identify positive findings in real-world reports, despite the observed performance degradation during external validation. This approach substantially reduces manual annotation requirements and privacy risks, providing a scalable foundation for constructing structured radiology datasets to support the development of clinically relevant medical artificial intelligence models.

References

  1. 1.Kikuchi, T., Yamagishi, Y., Yamamoto, K., Akashi, T., Mori, H., Makimoto, H., & Kohro, T. (2026). Context-aware sentence classification of radiology reports using synthetic data: Development and validation study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 28(4), e86365. https://doi.org/10.2196/86365
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service