Congenital cytomegalovirus screening by dried blood spot: a systematic review
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Newborns undergoing screening for congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection |
| I — Intervention | Dried blood spot (DBS) PCR testing for cCMV detection |
| C — Comparator | Confirmatory PCR testing using saliva or urine samples collected within 21 days of life |
| O — Outcomes | Diagnostic accuracy of DBS PCR: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for cCMV detection |
Bottom Line
This systematic review of nine studies evaluating dried blood spot (DBS) PCR for congenital CMV (cCMV) screening reveals a fundamental tension: while specificity is excellent (99.9%–100%), sensitivity is highly variable and often inadequate (28.3%–79.3%), meaning that DBS PCR alone would miss a substantial proportion of infected newborns. The absence of pooled estimates, formal heterogeneity analysis, and GRADE assessment limits the strength of conclusions. The high specificity supports DBS as a potential first-tier screening tool within a two-step strategy, but the low sensitivity — particularly in real-world programs compared to research settings — means it cannot replace saliva or urine PCR as a standalone screen. For Australian clinicians, cCMV is not currently part of the NNBSP, and this evidence base, while promising in concept, is insufficient to support a policy change without standardisation of DBS DNA extraction and PCR methodology, and formal health technology assessment. Early identification of cCMV remains clinically important given the preventable burden of sensorineural hearing loss; however, clinicians should advocate for improved screening methods rather than premature adoption of a tool with unacceptably variable sensitivity.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported
Effect Size: Sensitivity range: 28.3% to 79.3%; Specificity range: 99.9% to 100%
Primary Outcome: Diagnostic accuracy of DBS PCR for congenital CMV detection in newborns
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Sensitivity: 28.3%–79.3% (highly variable); Specificity: 99.9%–100%; PPV: 39%–100%; NPV: 99.6%–99.9%. The wide sensitivity range indicates DBS PCR would miss 20%–72% of cCMV-infected newborns depending on the method employed.
Confidence Interval: Not reported (ranges only provided across nine studies)
Clinical Application
DBS samples are already collected universally in most high-income countries as part of routine newborn metabolic screening, making DBS-based cCMV testing logistically attractive and cost-effective. However, the low and variable sensitivity means that DBS PCR alone is insufficient as a standalone screening tool without significant methodological standardisation. Paired or reflex testing strategies (e.g., DBS followed by confirmatory saliva/urine PCR) may improve clinical utility. In Australia, the National Newborn Bloodspot Screening Program (NNBSP) collects DBS from virtually all newborns, administered through state and territory health departments. Congenital CMV is not currently included in the Australian newborn screening panel. The RACGP and RACP have not issued specific guidelines on universal cCMV screening. Antiviral therapy with valganciclovir is available in Australia (TGA-registered) and has demonstrated benefit in symptomatic cCMV with CNS involvement. PBS listing for valganciclovir in cCMV is limited to specific indications. Given the high sensitivity required for population screening and the current evidence gaps, incorporation of DBS cCMV PCR into the NNBSP would require further Australian-specific feasibility and cost-effectiveness data, as well as MSAC (Medical Services Advisory Committee) evaluation. The variable sensitivity reported in this review would be a significant barrier to MSAC approval in its current form. All newborns undergoing routine neonatal metabolic screening (Guthrie card/DBS collection), particularly in settings where universal saliva or urine PCR screening is not yet feasible. Most applicable to high-resource settings with established newborn screening infrastructure.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Congenital human cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is a leading cause of sensorineural hearing loss and neurological sequelae in children. Although newborn screening strategies remain controversial, dried blood spots (DBS) collected for routine metabolic screening have been proposed as a low-cost method for large-scale detection. This systematic review assessed studies that evaluated the accuracy of DBS testing for screening newborns for cCMV infection. A systematic review was conducted following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy and reported in accordance with PRISMA-DTA. The PIRT strategy included the following: Population (newborns undergoing screening for cCMV), Index test (detection of cCMV using DBS samples), Reference standard (confirmatory testing using saliva or urine PCR collected within 21 days of life), Target condition (cCMV infection). Searches were performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Bireme, Embase, LILACS, SciELO, and CENTRAL. The search identified 365 articles; after removing 210 duplicates, 155 were screened by title and abstract, and 9 studies were included. The included studies tested between 1174 and 551,034 DBS samples each. Confirmatory testing used PCR in urine (seven studies) or saliva (two studies). Three studies used paired samples for screening; sensitivity ranged from 28.3% to 79.3%, specificity from 99.9% to 100%. Positive predictive value (PPV) ranged from 39 to 100%, and negative predictive value (NPV) from 99.6% to 99.9%. CONCLUSION: Neonatal screening for congenital cytomegalovirus using DBS samples is promising, since it would allow early identification for timely interventions to reduce sequelae. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Congenital CMV is a leading cause of sensorineural hearing loss and neurodevelopmental sequelae, with many cases asymptomatic at birth. Diagnosis relies on early viral detection, and while saliva/urine PCR is sensitive, newborn screening lacks consensus and feasibility is unknown in many settings. WHAT IS NEW: • DBS PCR emerges as a scalable, feasible low-cost screening alternative for cCMV screening. A few states in the USA and provinces in Canada have implemented newborn cCMV screening programs using DBS, but the sensitivity appears lower than in research studies. Improving DNA extraction and PCR methods are required as well as assessing feasibility of using other specimens (e.g., urine or saliva) for screening.
References
- 1.Machado, R. A., Bicalho Garcia, I. S., de Albuquerque, G. S., de Araújo, J. L. P., Coelho Gonçalves, R., Rodrigues de Almeida, N. M., Dos Santos Borges, R., Machado Carellos, E. V., & de Castro Romanelli, R. M. (2026). Congenital cytomegalovirus screening by dried blood spot: a systematic review. European Journal of Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.70132
Related Research
Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine
Intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants: A systematic review of risk- and outcome-prediction models
2 Aug 2026
Indian journal of pediatrics
Emerging Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Care
2 Aug 2026
JAMA
Prone Positioning in Infants With Acute Bronchiolitis: The PROPOSITIS Randomized Clinical Trial
30 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service