Combining Genomics With Lipid and Inflammatory Biomarkers to Predict Coronary Artery Disease Risk: UK Biobank Study
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | UK Biobank participants aged 40-69 years without baseline CAD (n=215,695) |
| I — Intervention | Combined 4-biomarker model (CAD PRS, LDL-C, Lp(a), hsCRP) |
| C — Comparator | Pooled cohort equations and individual biomarkers |
| O — Outcomes | Incident coronary artery disease over 12-year follow-up |
Bottom Line
This large UK Biobank study demonstrates that combining genetic risk scores with traditional lipid and inflammatory biomarkers improves coronary artery disease risk prediction beyond current clinical tools. The 4-biomarker model (CAD polygenic risk score, LDL-cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), and high-sensitivity CRP) achieved superior discrimination (C-statistic 0.753 vs 0.740) and 32% net reclassification improvement compared to pooled cohort equations. Risk associations were stronger in men and younger individuals, with those having all four biomarkers elevated showing 4.65-fold increased CAD risk. While promising for precision medicine approaches to cardiovascular prevention, the findings require external validation in diverse populations before clinical implementation. The genetic component may be particularly valuable for identifying high-risk younger patients who might benefit from earlier intervention.
Key Findings
P Value: P-interaction ≤0.001 for sex differences in CAD PRS; P<0.0001 for age interactions
Effect Size: Combined 4-biomarker model: 4.65-fold increased risk when all biomarkers elevated
Primary Outcome: Incident coronary artery disease over 12 years
Nnt Or Sensitivity: C-statistic 0.753 for combined model vs 0.740 for pooled cohort equations; 32.0% net reclassification improvement
Confidence Interval: Individual HRs: CAD PRS 1.79 (1.70-1.89), LDL-C 1.60 (1.48-1.66), hsCRP 1.64 (1.57-1.72), Lp(a) 1.20 (1.12-1.29)
Clinical Application
CAD PRS requires genetic testing infrastructure; other biomarkers routinely available in clinical practice Relevant to Australian practice; LDL-C and hsCRP widely available through Medicare; genetic testing emerging through initiatives like Australian Genomics. Aligns with RACGP cardiovascular risk assessment guidelines Middle-aged adults (40-69 years) without established CAD seeking cardiovascular risk assessment
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) polygenic risk score (PRS), low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) are biomarkers that predict CAD. It is unclear whether integrating genomics with lipid and inflammatory biomarkers could complement traditional risk scores in identifying people at risk of CAD. OBJECTIVES: This study assesses the predictive value of CAD PRS, LDL-C, Lp(a), and hsCRP for incident CAD across different age and sex groups. METHODS: Participants (n = 215,695) from the UK Biobank aged 40 to 69 years with baseline CAD PRS, LDL-C, Lp(a), and hsCRP values were followed for 12 years to assess the incidence of CAD. We evaluated a multivariable-adjusted Cox model that included all 4 biomarkers, net reclassification index, C-statistics, and population attributable risk across different age and sex groups. RESULTS: Over a 12-year follow-up, 4,721 men and 2,425 women developed CAD. The HRs for incident CAD associated with each biomarker elevation were 1.79 (95% CI: 1.70-1.89) for CAD PRS, 1.60 (95% CI: 1.48-1.66) for LDL-C, 1.20 (95% CI: 1.12-1.29) for Lp(a), and 1.64 (95% CI: 1.57-1.72) for hsCRP. CAD PRS demonstrated a stronger association in men (HR per SD: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.45-1.54) than women (HR per SD: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.31-1.44; P-interaction ≤ 0.001). All biomarkers conferred greater HRs at younger ages (P < 0.0001). Individuals with all biomarkers elevated had a 4.65-fold increased risk of CAD compared with those with no elevated biomarkers. A combined 4-biomarker model had a higher C-statistic of 0.753 compared with the pooled cohort equations (C-statistic of 0.740). The C-statistic of the combined 4-biomarker model was also higher in younger individuals in both sexes and yielded a 32.0% continuous net reclassification index when compared with the pooled cohort equations. CONCLUSIONS: CAD PRS, LDL-C, hsCRP, and Lp(a) show independent age- and sex-specific associations with CAD. Measuring all 4 biomarkers may improve midlife CAD risk prediction for both male and female patients.
References
- 1.Farah, R., Kim, M. S., Truong, B., Sui, Y., Cho, S. M. J., Urbut, S. M., Patel, A., Ridker, P. M., Natarajan, P., & Fahed, A. C. (2026). Combining genomics with lipid and inflammatory biomarkers to predict coronary artery disease risk: UK Biobank study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2026.01.076
Related Research
Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
From data to diagnosis: A comprehensive review of machine learning-driven wearable sensors in healthcare.
2 Aug 2026
Ultrasound in medicine & biology
A Systematic Review: The Application of Attention Mechanisms in Medical Ultrasound Image Processing
2 Aug 2026
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
Explainable machine learning in healthcare: methods, interpretation, and applications for clinical research
2 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service