Research AppraisalSystematic Review

Clozapine prescribing in treatment-resistant schizophrenia - an updated systematic literature review of barriers and facilitators among clinicians

European journal of clinical pharmacologyNolan, Siobhán, Sahm, Laura J, Fitzgerald, Ita11 Apr 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

80CEBM
Evidence: ModerateSystematic Review

PICO Framework

P — PopulationClinicians managing patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia
I — InterventionBarriers and facilitators to clozapine prescribing
C — ComparatorNot applicable (qualitative synthesis)
O — OutcomesIdentified barriers and facilitators affecting clozapine prescribing rates

Bottom Line

This systematic review identifies that barriers to clozapine prescribing in treatment-resistant schizophrenia operate at multiple levels beyond individual prescriber knowledge. Key barriers include insufficient clinician confidence, administrative burden, patient adherence concerns, and lack of dedicated care systems. The evidence suggests that structural interventions—including standardised training programs, point-of-care testing access, and dedicated clozapine clinics—are more likely to improve prescribing rates than targeting individual prescribers alone. For Australian clinicians, this supports arguments for streamlined PBS processes, enhanced pathology service integration, and systematic educational initiatives. The findings are particularly relevant given Australia's conservative clozapine prescribing patterns compared to international benchmarks, suggesting significant opportunity for improvement through targeted system-level interventions rather than relying solely on individual clinician education.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • Effect Size: Not applicable (qualitative synthesis)

  • Primary Outcome: Identification of multi-level barriers and facilitators to clozapine prescribing

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: 15 studies included providing comprehensive barrier/facilitator mapping

Clinical Application

High feasibility for implementing identified facilitators, particularly educational interventions and point-of-care testing Highly relevant to Australian practice given PBS restrictions on clozapine, need for regular monitoring through pathology services, and potential for dedicated clozapine clinics within public mental health services Mental health clinicians, psychiatrists, and healthcare administrators managing treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased rates of clozapine prescribing are essential to improving timely patient access within treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) management. The extent of geographical variation in its use suggests it is possible to develop interventions to increase clinician engagement. To inform intervention development, a contemporary review of barriers and facilitators to increased clozapine prescribing is required. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of research addressing barriers and facilitators to clozapine prescribing among clinicians within TRS management. METHODS: The review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to July 2025. Results were synthesized qualitatively. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included. Barriers related to clinicians, patients and carers, and healthcare institutions. Primary clinician-related barriers included insufficient knowledge of, and confidence in, managing clozapine treatment and the associated administrative burden. Primary patient-related barriers included concerns regarding patients' willingness to consistently adhere to clozapine treatment and associated monitoring requirements. A lack of dedicated systems of care to facilitate clozapine initiation and shared community care were the leading institutional barriers. Major facilitators included improved education for clinicians, access to point-of-care testing, and increased availability of dedicated clozapine clinics. CONCLUSION: Most barriers to systematically increasing clozapine prescribing rates are beyond the influence of individual prescribers. Instead, structural interventions focusing on (i) reducing the administrative burden associated with establishing clozapine treatment, (ii) increasing access to standardised training and supervision opportunities, and (iii) providing longitudinal support to clinicians when managing clozapine treatment, are required.

References

  1. 1.Nolan, S., Sahm, L. J., & Fitzgerald, I. (2026). Clozapine prescribing in treatment-resistant schizophrenia - an updated systematic literature review of barriers and facilitators among clinicians. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.003
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service