Research Appraisalobservational

Clinically significant DNA variation from the GENCOV and HostSeq COVID-19 genome sequencing studies

Journal of medical geneticsFrangione, Erika, Mahajan, Radhika, De Los Rios, Juan et al.20 Apr 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

80CEBM
Evidence: Moderateobservational

PICO Framework

P — PopulationCanadian participants from GENCOV and HostSeq COVID-19 genome sequencing studies
I — InterventionManual variant classification and annotation using custom workflows
C — ComparatorClinVar database classifications for pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants
O — OutcomesConcordance rates between manual classifications and ClinVar, identification of discrepancies in pathogenic variant classifications

Bottom Line

This cross-sectional study of 1956 pathogenic variants from Canadian COVID-19 genome sequencing cohorts reveals significant gaps in the ClinVar database, with 35% of expert-classified pathogenic variants absent and 31% showing classification discrepancies. The findings highlight critical limitations in current genetic variant databases that directly impact clinical decision-making. For Australian clinicians, this underscores the importance of expert genetic counselling and the need for caution when interpreting variant significance, particularly for patients from diverse ethnic backgrounds. The study supports ongoing efforts to improve international variant sharing and emphasises that negative database searches do not exclude pathogenicity. Clinicians should consider multiple evidence sources and seek specialist genetic advice when interpreting variants of uncertain significance, especially given the potential for database incompleteness demonstrated in this large-scale analysis.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not reported

  • Effect Size: 69% concordance rate for pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants

  • Primary Outcome: Concordance between manual variant classification and ClinVar database

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: 65% of manually classified P/LP variants found in ClinVar, 35% absent from database

  • Confidence Interval: Not reported

Clinical Application

Highly feasible - highlights need for improved variant database curation and periodic reassessment of classifications Relevant to Australian genetic testing practices, supports need for local variant databases and improved international data sharing. Aligns with NHMRC guidelines on genomic data sharing and TGA oversight of genetic testing Patients undergoing genetic testing for Mendelian diseases, particularly those of European and diverse ancestry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vast amounts of genome sequencing data generated from large-scale research studies like HostSeq provide an opportunity to summarise the spectrum of pathogenic variation in a subset of the Canadian population. Sharing variant-level data with public databases, like ClinVar, is crucial for advancing our understanding of genomic variants related to Mendelian diseases. However, such entries are often incomplete or contain discrepancies which render interpretation and classifications less useful. METHODS: The GENCOV and HostSeq cohorts were annotated and summarised using custom workflows to identify variants with a pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) classification in ClinVar. These variants were further filtered using custom gene panels, gnomAD frequency, variant type, gene-disease relationship and the number of reputable ClinVar laboratory submissions. Manually assessed variants from the GENCOV study were compared with ClinVar classifications to identify discrepancies. RESULTS: A total of 1956 unique variants were manually classified as P/LP through the GENCOV study. Of these, 65% (1276) were also identified in ClinVar, and among those, 69% (889) had concordant P/LP classifications. The manual assessment of unique exonic variants in GENCOV yielded a higher number of putative P/LP variants (1595), including truncating and missense variants compared with the 127 unique exonic P/LP variants in HostSeq. CONCLUSION: These results highlight that a large proportion of P/LP variation is either absent or has conflicting evidence for pathogenicity in ClinVar, emphasising the importance of periodic reassessment, discrepancy resolution and updates to ensure completeness and accuracy of public databases.

References

  1. 1.Frangione, E., Mahajan, R., De Los Rios, J., Casalino, S., Aujla, N., Arnoldo, S., Binnie, A., Borgundvaag, B., Dagher, M., Devine, L., Faghfoury, H., Friedman, S. M., Fung, C. Y. J., Khan, Z., Morgan, G., Richardson, D., Stern, S., Taher, A., Taher, J., & Lerner-Ellis, J. (2026). Clinically significant DNA variation from the GENCOV and HostSeq COVID-19 genome sequencing studies. Journal of Medical Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg-2025-111029
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service