Research AppraisalSystematic Review

Change in skeletal muscle mass during systemic cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)Svendsen, Lukas, Jensen, Sandra, Hansen, Stine et al.27 May 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

70CEBM
Evidence: ModerateSystematic Review

PICO Framework

P — PopulationPatients with cancer receiving systemic treatment (n=10,502; 52% male; median age 64 years)
I — InterventionSystemic cancer treatment (chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy ± targeted therapy)
C — ComparatorPre-treatment baseline skeletal muscle mass measurements
O — OutcomesChange in skeletal muscle mass during treatment, measured as standardized mean change

Bottom Line

This large meta-analysis of 78 studies demonstrates that skeletal muscle mass consistently declines during systemic cancer treatment, with an average 5% loss over 90 days. While statistically significant, the clinical effect size is small by conventional standards. However, the extremely high heterogeneity (I² = 92%) severely limits confidence in any single pooled estimate. The decline appears most pronounced with chemotherapy compared to immunotherapy. For Australian clinicians, this evidence supports routine monitoring of muscle mass in cancer patients, particularly those receiving chemotherapy, but the substantial variability between studies means individualized assessment remains essential. The authors appropriately conclude that standardized prospective studies are needed before definitive clinical recommendations can be made regarding interventions to prevent muscle loss during cancer treatment.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not explicitly reported but CI excludes null

  • Effect Size: SMC = -0.24 (small effect size by Cohen's criteria)

  • Primary Outcome: Standardized mean change in skeletal muscle mass during systemic cancer treatment

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Corresponds to approximately 5% decline in skeletal muscle mass over median 90-day treatment period

  • Confidence Interval: 95% CI: -0.29 to -0.20

Clinical Application

Muscle mass monitoring feasible with CT/MRI imaging already used in cancer care, though standardized protocols needed Relevant to Australian oncology practice; could inform TGA considerations for supportive care guidelines and potential PBS coverage for interventions targeting muscle preservation Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy across multiple cancer types

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Loss of skeletal muscle mass (SMM) is common during systemic cancer treatment, but the magnitude and variability across cancer and treatment types remain uncertain. We aimed to describe changes in SMM during systemic cancer treatment supported by pooled quantitative estimates. PATIENTS/MATERIAL AND METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until April 2025 for longitudinal studies reporting SMM during chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy (± targeted therapy) in patients with cancer (PROSPERO CRD42022308388). Standardized mean changes (SMC) were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses using the restricted maximum-likelihood estimator with Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Heterogeneity was assessed using I². Risk of bias was assessed with the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. RESULTS: Seventy-eight studies (n = 10,502; 52% male; median age 64 years [interquartile range, IQR: 34-77]) were included. Meta-analysis across cancers showed an association between systemic cancer treatment and decline in SMM (59 studies; n = 6,373; SMC = -0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.29 to -0.20; I² = 92%), corresponding to -5% over a median interval of 90 (IQR: 71-129) days among studies (62%) reporting assessment intervals. Declines were most pronounced during chemotherapy (± targeted therapy). INTERPRETATION: Declines in SMM are frequently observed during systemic cancer treatment, particularly during chemotherapy (± targeted therapy), although effect sizes were generally small per Cohen's thresholds. However, substantial heterogeneity limits interpretation of a single pooled estimate. Prospective studies with standardized methods are needed to clarify trajectories, mechanisms and clinical implications of SMM loss.

References

  1. 1.Svendsen, L., Jensen, S., Hansen, S., Sørensen, V., Johansen, C., Suetta, C., Pappot, H., Simonsen, C., Hermann Tang, L., Oksbjerg Dalton, S., Ammitzbøll, G., & Skjødt Rafn, B. (2026). Change in skeletal muscle mass during systemic cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Oncologica, Article 45726. https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2026.45726
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service