cGAS-STING agonists in preclinical glioblastoma animal models: a systematic review of tumor microenvironment modulation and survival outcomes
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Animal models of glioblastoma (GBM) |
| I — Intervention | cGAS-STING pathway agonists (synthetic and natural cyclic dinucleotides, non-cyclic STING agonists) |
| C — Comparator | Control groups (not explicitly detailed in abstract) |
| O — Outcomes | Survival outcomes, tumor microenvironment changes (CD8+ T-cell infiltration, NK cell infiltration, macrophage polarization) |
Bottom Line
This systematic review of 14 preclinical studies demonstrates that STING agonists can enhance anti-tumor immune responses in glioblastoma animal models through increased cytotoxic lymphocyte infiltration and favorable macrophage repolarization. While survival benefits were observed across diverse delivery methods, the evidence remains at the preclinical stage with significant translation challenges. The authors appropriately acknowledge limitations including model constraints, limited clinical success of STING modulation in other cancers, and potential for maladaptive inflammation with sustained activation. For Australian clinicians, this represents promising but early-stage research that may inform future clinical trial design rather than current practice. The work highlights the ongoing challenge of translating immunotherapy advances from preclinical glioblastoma models to meaningful clinical outcomes in this devastating disease.
Key Findings
P Value: Not provided
Effect Size: Not quantified - descriptive synthesis only
Primary Outcome: Increased CD8+ T-cell and NK cell infiltration with macrophage repolarization toward pro-inflammatory phenotypes
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Several studies reported prolonged survival with long-term tumor clearance in select models
Confidence Interval: Not provided
Clinical Application
Multiple delivery methods demonstrated (intracranial injection, hydrogels, nanoparticles) but clinical translation remains challenging No direct relevance to current Australian practice; TGA approval would require successful clinical trials following preclinical promise Currently limited to research settings; not applicable to clinical practice
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Glioblastoma (GBM) is characterized by an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and poor responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade, driving interest in cGAS-STING pathway activation to stimulate antitumor immunity. We performed a systematic review of preclinical in vivo studies evaluating STING agonists in glioblastoma, with emphasis on immune microenvironment effects and survival outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase was conducted through February 2025 following PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they evaluated STING agonists in live animal models of GBM and reported survival outcomes or tumor microenvironment changes. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed qualitatively based on study design and reporting characteristics. Given heterogeneity in models, treatments, and outcomes, results were synthesized descriptively. RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, spanning synthetic and natural cyclic dinucleotides and non-cyclic STING agonists. Across diverse delivery methods, including intracranial injection, hydrogels, and nanoparticle systems, STING agonists were associated with increased CD8 + T-cell and NK cell infiltration and repolarization of tumor-associated macrophages toward pro-inflammatory phenotypes. Several studies reported prolonged survival, including long-term tumor clearance in select models. Combination therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors or radiotherapy showed synergistic effects in some studies. CONCLUSIONS: STING agonists can enhance anti-tumor immune responses and prolong survival in preclinical GBM models by promoting cytotoxic lymphocyte recruitment and remodeling the tumor-associated myeloid landscape. However, translation remains challenging due to limitations of current models, the limited clinical traction STING modulation has thus far achieved in other cancer types, incomplete understanding of cell-type-specific STING activation in the brain, and the possibility that sustained STING signaling may drive maladaptive inflammation rather than durable antitumor immunity.
References
- 1.Sampath, S. G., Tang, A. J., Chen, A. X., Viswanathan, A., Izima, C., Manriquez, A. H., Dadario, N. B., Winans, N., Amini, M., Rolfe, N., Adapa, A. R., Argenziano, M. G., Sperring, C. P., Neira, J. A., Lei, L., Canoll, P., & Bruce, J. N. (2026). cGAS-STING agonists in preclinical glioblastoma animal models: a systematic review of tumor microenvironment modulation and survival outcomes. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111647
Related Research
Clinical spine surgery
An Introduction to Machine Learning for the Practicing Spine Surgeon
2 Aug 2026
Brain and behavior
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Poor Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
1 Aug 2026
Neurosurgical review
Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting postoperative hydrocephalus in 1,073 posterior fossa tumor patients
31 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service