Cellular immunotherapy for COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: Results of the CIRCA-19 phase 1 safety and phase 2 randomized controlled trials
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Patients with severe COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) |
| I — Intervention | Freshly cultured umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (UC-MSCs) up to 270 × 10⁶ cells in three divided daily doses |
| C — Comparator | Standard care (control group in phase 2 trial) |
| O — Outcomes | Safety, clinical outcomes, lymphopenia resolution, quality of life measures (SF-36) at 6 months |
Bottom Line
This early-phase study suggests umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells may be safe and potentially beneficial for severe COVID-19 ARDS, with evidence of immunomodulatory effects and improved quality of life at 6 months. However, the very small sample size (22 patients in the randomized component), lack of detailed statistical reporting, and unclear methodology limit confidence in the findings. While the biological rationale is sound and the treatment appears well-tolerated, larger, well-designed randomized controlled trials with robust statistical analysis are needed before this experimental therapy can be recommended for routine clinical use. The potential for durable clinical benefits warrants further investigation, but current evidence is insufficient to change practice.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported
Effect Size: Qualitative improvement in all clinical outcomes (specific measures not quantified)
Primary Outcome: Safety and tolerability of UC-MSC therapy
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not calculable from available data
Confidence Interval: Not reported
Clinical Application
Limited by requirement for specialized cell culture facilities and expertise in MSC preparation and administration Would require TGA approval for cell therapy products; relevant for Australian ICUs but implementation would need significant infrastructure investment Critically ill patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS in intensive care settings
Abstract
The ability of immunomodulatory mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) to improve COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in clinical trials is uncertain. We assessed whether freshly cultured umbilical cord (UC)-derived MSCs improved outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS. We enrolled 37 patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS: 15 in the phase 1 dose escalation and open label extension studies (NCT04400032), and 22 patients in the phase 2b randomized clinical trial (NCT04865107). Delivery of up to 270 × 106 MSCs in three divided daily doses was well tolerated and resulted in qualitative improvement in all clinical outcomes. Furthermore, MSCs resulted in resolution of lymphopenia, consistent with an important immunomodulatory effect, with significant improvement in patient reported quality-of-life measures (SF-36) at 6 months pointing to possible durable clinical effects. These findings suggest a potential benefit of freshly cultured, UC-MSCs in severe COVID-19 ARDS, associated with biological evidence of favorable immunomodulatory activity.
References
- 1.English, S. W., Fergusson, D. A., Lalu, M. M., Courtman, D. W., Khan, S., Sobh, M., Watpool, I., Champagne, J., Hodgins, S., Thébaud, B., Soliman, K., Chassé, M., Dos Santos, C. C., Möbius, M. A., Freund, D., Rüdiger, M., & Stewart, D. J. (2026). Cellular immunotherapy for COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: Results of the CIRCA-19 phase 1 safety and phase 2 randomized controlled trials. *Stem Cell Reports*, *15*(4), 102854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2026.102854
Related Research
Journal of critical care
Artificial intelligence and computerized decision support in adult intensive care: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
3 Aug 2026
Current opinion in critical care
Smart feeding: the role of artificial intelligence and integrated nutrition platforms in the ICU
2 Aug 2026
Brain and behavior
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Poor Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
1 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service