CALYPSO: Final Results of Savolitinib and Durvalumab Combination in Metastatic Papillary Renal Cancer
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Patients with metastatic papillary renal cancer (PRC), treatment-naïve or pretreated, with subset analysis of MET-driven tumours |
| I — Intervention | Savolitinib (MET inhibitor) plus durvalumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) combination therapy |
| C — Comparator | No control group (single-arm study) |
| O — Outcomes | Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) biomarker correlations |
Bottom Line
This single-arm phase II study demonstrates promising activity of savolitinib plus durvalumab in metastatic papillary renal cancer, particularly in patients with MET-driven tumours who showed 53% response rates and 27.4-month median survival. The combination appears most beneficial in molecularly selected patients, supporting the importance of biomarker-driven treatment selection. Circulating tumour DNA emerged as a potentially useful prognostic biomarker, with baseline positivity predicting shorter survival and clearance correlating with improved outcomes. However, the small sample size (41 patients, 17 MET-driven) and single-arm design limit definitive conclusions. Wide confidence intervals reflect statistical imprecision. While results support ongoing phase III evaluation, routine clinical use should await larger randomised controlled trial data. For Australian practice, this represents a potential future treatment option pending regulatory approval and PBS listing, particularly relevant given limited effective therapies for papillary renal cancer.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported for primary endpoints
Effect Size: Median OS 18.3 months (ITT) vs 27.4 months (MET-driven)
Primary Outcome: Overall response rate 34% (95% CI: 20.0-51.0) in ITT population, 53% (95% CI: 28.0-77.0) in MET-driven patients
Nnt Or Sensitivity: ctDNA positivity associated with shorter OS (7.3 vs 33.3 months); ctDNA clearance correlated with improved OS (31.3 vs 7.2 months)
Confidence Interval: OS ITT: 95% CI 7.3-30.7 months; MET-driven: 95% CI 9.3-37.4 months
Clinical Application
Requires access to MET inhibitor savolitinib and PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab, plus molecular testing capabilities for patient selection Durvalumab available on PBS for certain indications; savolitinib not currently PBS-listed. Would require TGA approval and PBS consideration. Molecular testing infrastructure available through major cancer centres Patients with metastatic papillary renal cancer, particularly those with MET-driven tumours identified through molecular testing
Abstract
PURPOSE: The CALYPSO study demonstrated activity of savolitinib and durvalumab in MET-driven papillary renal cancer (PRC). We report final efficacy outcomes and exploratory circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) biomarker analysis. METHODS: This single-arm phase II study evaluated savolitinib and durvalumab in treatment-naïve or pretreated PRC. End points included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). FoundationOne CDx assessed DNA alterations and MET/PD-L1 or MET/tumor mutational burden (TMB) copositivity. ctDNA collected at baseline and on treatment was correlated with outcomes. RESULTS: At 41-months median follow-up, ORR was 34% (95% CI, 20.0 to 51.0) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 41) and 53% (95% CI, 28.0 to 77.0) in MET-driven patients (n = 17). Median PFS was 6.5 (95% CI, 2.7 to 12.0) versus 13.9 months (95% CI, 2.9 to 23.8), and OS was 18.3 (95% CI, 7.3 to 30.7) versus 27.4 months (95% CI, 9.3 to 37.4), in the ITT population and the MET-driven population, respectively. PD-L1 (66% positive) and TMB (median 2.5 mut/Mb) status did not correlate with response. Baseline ctDNA positivity (10/21) correlated with shorter OS (median 7.3 v 33.3 months), while ctDNA clearance and mean variant allele frequency reduction correlated with improved OS (median 31.3 v 7.2 and 31.3 v 15.5 months, respectively). CONCLUSION: Savolitinib plus durvalumab shows OS in MET-driven PRC, supporting the ongoing SAMETA RIII trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05043090). ctDNA may be a useful predictive biomarker.
References
- 1.Jackson-Spence, F., Larkin, J., Patel, P., Valderrama, B. P., Rodriguez-Vida, A., Glen, H., Thistlethwaite, F. C., Ralph, C., Srinivasan, G., Mendez-Vidal, M. J., Childress, M., Li, W., Boyle, P., Gascó, A., Markovets, A., Hartmaier, R., Ackerman, C., Szabados, B. E., Priyadarshini, G., Jamal, F., Powles, T., & Suárez, C. (2026). CALYPSO: Final results of savolitinib and durvalumab combination in metastatic papillary renal cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-25-01840
Related Research
Cancer medicine
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1 Aug 2026
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
User perceptions of machine learning models as decision support for colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team conferences (AID-SIM-2): a qualitative simulation study.
1 Aug 2026
Journal of breast imaging
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
30 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service