Blockchain-Enabled Self-Sovereign Identity Applications in Health Care: Scoping Review
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Healthcare systems and applications requiring identity management |
| I — Intervention | Blockchain-enabled self-sovereign identity (BC-SSI) systems |
| C — Comparator | Traditional centralized identity management systems or no intervention |
| O — Outcomes | Application domains, development stages, technological infrastructure, system maturity, and clinical deployment readiness |
Bottom Line
This scoping review of 37 studies reveals that blockchain-enabled self-sovereign identity systems in healthcare remain largely conceptual, with limited real-world deployment evidence. While the technology shows promise for addressing identity fragmentation and privacy concerns in healthcare, significant gaps exist between technological capability and clinical readiness. Key challenges include interoperability limitations, governance frameworks, and integration with existing healthcare infrastructure. For Australian healthcare providers, these findings suggest that while BC-SSI may eventually support patient-controlled health data management and improve interoperability with systems like My Health Record, current implementations are not ready for clinical deployment. Healthcare organizations should monitor this emerging field while focusing on established identity management solutions that meet immediate clinical and regulatory requirements.
Key Findings
P Value: Not applicable for scoping review
Effect Size: 37 peer-reviewed studies identified over 12-month search period
Primary Outcome: BC-SSI research in healthcare remains at early maturity stage with most studies proposing conceptual models or prototypes
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Structural gap identified between technological capability and clinical deployment readiness
Confidence Interval: Not applicable for scoping review
Clinical Application
Currently limited due to early technology maturity, interoperability challenges, and insufficient integration with existing healthcare infrastructure Relevant to Australian Digital Health Strategy and My Health Record interoperability challenges, but requires alignment with Privacy Act 1988 and TGA digital therapeutics framework Healthcare organizations considering blockchain-based identity management systems, particularly for electronic health records and mobile health applications
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Self-sovereign identity (SSI) provides a decentralized approach to digital identity management, enabling individuals to control their personal data without reliance on centralized authorities. Blockchain technology offers a tamper-resistant and distributed infrastructure that can support secure and verifiable identity systems. In health care, where identity fragmentation, privacy risks, and interoperability challenges persist, blockchain-enabled SSI (BC-SSI) has been proposed as a potential solution. However, existing research remains heterogeneous, with varying levels of technical maturity and limited evidence of real-world deployment. OBJECTIVE: This study conducts a scoping review to systematically map BC-SSI applications in health care and to analyze their application domains, development stages, study aims, targeted challenges, and technological infrastructures. In addition, this study aims to identify structural gaps in current research and assess the readiness of BC-SSI systems for clinical deployment. METHODS: This review followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) methodology. A comprehensive literature search conducted between September 2024 and August 2025 identified 37 peer-reviewed studies that met predefined inclusion criteria. Data were extracted and synthesized using descriptive and thematic analyses across application areas, system maturity, technological components, and reported challenges. RESULTS: The findings indicate that BC-SSI research in health care remains at an early stage of maturity, with most studies proposing conceptual models or prototype implementations and limited real-world validation. Applications predominantly focus on identity verification, credential management, and privacy-preserving data exchange across domains such as electronic health records, mobile health, and access control systems. Commonly used technologies include decentralized identifiers, verifiable credentials, smart contracts, and privacy-enhancing mechanisms such as zero-knowledge proofs and selective disclosure. Despite rapid technical development, persistent challenges include interoperability limitations, governance gaps, usability concerns, and insufficient integration with health care infrastructures. Notably, a structural gap was identified between technological capability and system-level readiness for clinical deployment. CONCLUSIONS: BC-SSI technologies demonstrate potential for enabling secure, interoperable, and patient-centric identity management in health care. However, current research is predominantly technology-driven and lacks sufficient system-level validation. This study highlights the need for integrated architectural approaches, governance frameworks, and real-world evaluation to bridge the gap between conceptual innovation and clinical implementation. Advancing BC-SSI toward health care adoption will require coordinated progress across technical, organizational, and regulatory dimensions.
References
- 1.Pokharel, A., & Kathayat, S. (2026). Blockchain-enabled self-sovereign identity applications in health care: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 28(5), e89574. https://doi.org/10.2196/89574
Related Research
The Journal of rheumatology
Examining the Role of Wearables in Inflammatory Arthritis Care: A Narrative Literature Review
3 Aug 2026
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
ChatGPT in urogynecology: Comparing large language model responses to human experts
3 Aug 2026
Sleep medicine
Concordance of wearable device sleep metrics with patient-reported sleep quality: A systematic review
3 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service