Associations between olfactory dysfunction and structural MRI findings in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Adults with confirmed Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing olfactory dysfunction |
| I — Intervention | Structural MRI assessment of brain regions (olfactory sulcus, olfactory bulb, cortical grey matter, hippocampus, parahippocampus, basal ganglia) |
| C — Comparator | PD patients without olfactory dysfunction, healthy controls, or within-group correlation analyses |
| O — Outcomes | Neuroanatomical correlates of olfactory dysfunction in PD; structural MRI changes as potential early biomarkers for PD diagnosis or prognosis |
Bottom Line
This systematic review synthesises structural MRI evidence across 20 studies (1,092 PD patients) to identify neuroanatomical correlates of olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson's disease. Convergent findings implicate the olfactory sulcus, olfactory bulb, hippocampus, parahippocampus, and basal ganglia as regions showing structural changes associated with olfactory impairment. However, the review is substantially limited by the absence of meta-analysis, no formal risk of bias assessment, significant methodological heterogeneity across included studies, and an unclear search strategy. No pooled effect sizes or precision estimates are provided. The authors appropriately conclude that standardised longitudinal studies are needed before these MRI findings can be validated as diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers. For Australian clinicians, olfactory dysfunction remains a clinically useful early non-motor indicator of PD, but structural MRI is not yet ready for routine biomarker application in this context. This review provides a useful conceptual framework and research agenda rather than actionable clinical guidance. Senior clinicians should regard these findings as hypothesis-generating, supporting the case for well-designed prospective imaging studies with standardised protocols.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported at the review level; individual study statistics not synthesised
Effect Size: Not reported; narrative synthesis only — no pooled effect sizes calculated
Primary Outcome: Structural MRI changes associated with olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson's disease, identified across olfactory sulcus, olfactory bulb, cortical grey matter, hippocampus, parahippocampus, and basal ganglia
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not applicable; no diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis performed. Structural MRI findings are proposed as potential early biomarkers but sensitivity and specificity are not calculated at the review level
Confidence Interval: Not reported; no meta-analysis performed
Clinical Application
Structural MRI is widely available in Australian tertiary and many secondary care settings. However, the lack of standardised MRI protocols and olfactory assessment tools identified in this review means that routine clinical application as a diagnostic or prognostic biomarker is not yet feasible. Implementation would require consensus on MRI acquisition parameters and validated olfactory testing protocols. In Australia, PD affects approximately 80,000 individuals, with incidence rising with an ageing population. Olfactory testing is not currently part of standard RACGP or Neurology Society of Australia PD diagnostic guidelines. Structural MRI for PD is available under Medicare (MBS Item 63551 and related items) but is not specifically indicated for olfactory biomarker assessment. No TGA-approved structural MRI biomarker protocol for PD olfactory dysfunction currently exists. The findings of this review are hypothesis-generating and do not yet support changes to Australian clinical practice guidelines. Future Australian longitudinal cohort studies (e.g., through the Australian Parkinson's Mission) could contribute standardised data to address the gaps identified. Adults with established Parkinson's disease diagnosis, particularly those with early or prominent olfactory dysfunction. Potentially applicable to prodromal PD populations where olfactory loss precedes motor symptoms, though this review does not specifically address prodromal cohorts.
Abstract
Olfactory dysfunction is a common and early non-motor symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) studies have reported changes in olfactory-related brain regions, but findings remain inconsistent. This review synthesizes MRI evidence to clarify neuroanatomical correlates of olfactory dysfunction in PD. We performed a systematic review to find the associations between olfactory dysfunction and structural MRI findings in people with PD. A systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science yielded 20 eligible studies. The eligible studies involved 1,092 patients with PD. Although there were inconsistent regions of interest and types of analysis, we identified structural changes in the olfactory sulcus and bulb, cortical gray matter, hippocampus, parahippocampus, and basal ganglia that are associated with olfactory dysfunction. Olfactory dysfunction in PD is linked to structural changes in primary olfactory, limbic, and cortical regions. These MRI findings may serve as early biomarkers, but standardized, longitudinal studies are needed to confirm their diagnostic or prognostic value.
References
- 1.Alikhani, Y., Zolfaghari, A., Shahkarami, F., & Seyedmirzaei, H. (2026). Associations between olfactory dysfunction and structural MRI findings in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. Brain Imaging and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.16041
Related Research
Sleep medicine reviews
Machine and deep learning in REM sleep behavior disorder: a scoping review and analysis of reporting quality
3 Aug 2026
Neurological research
Federated deep learning model for epilepsy seizure detection using electroencephalogram (EEG) signal
2 Aug 2026
Journal of psychiatric research
Systematic review of machine learning and deep learning models for EEG-based detection of depression.
2 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service