Research AppraisalSystematic Review

Association between air pollution and chronic cough: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Environmental researchKim, Hyejun, Lai, Kefang, Cisse, Tariq et al.15 May 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

80CEBM
Evidence: ModerateSystematic Review

PICO Framework

P — PopulationGeneral population exposed to air pollution (adults and children)
I — InterventionAir pollution exposure (PM2.5, NO2)
C — ComparatorLower levels of air pollution exposure
O — OutcomesChronic cough incidence and prevalence

Bottom Line

This systematic review provides modest evidence linking air pollution exposure to chronic cough, with stronger associations for NO2 than PM2.5. The effect sizes are small but statistically significant for NO2 (OR 1.04 per 10 μg/m³). However, the evidence base is limited (only 8 studies) and consists entirely of observational data, precluding causal conclusions. Clinicians should consider environmental exposure history in patients with chronic cough, particularly in urban areas with poor air quality. The findings support public health measures to improve air quality but are insufficient alone to change individual clinical management. Stronger evidence is needed before definitive practice recommendations, though the biological plausibility and consistency of findings suggest this association warrants clinical attention.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not explicitly reported for pooled estimates

  • Effect Size: OR 1.10 (PM2.5) and OR 1.04 (NO2) per 10 μg/m³ increase

  • Primary Outcome: Chronic cough associated with air pollution exposure

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Stronger associations observed in adults and males

  • Confidence Interval: PM2.5: 95% CI 0.99-1.22; NO2: 95% CI 1.02-1.06

Clinical Application

Environmental history-taking feasible in clinical practice Relevant to Australian urban areas with air quality concerns; aligns with RACGP environmental health guidelines and TGA air quality monitoring General population, particularly adults and males in areas with air pollution

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic cough is a common and debilitating respiratory symptom, yet its association with air pollution remains insufficiently understood. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies evaluating the association between air pollution and chronic cough. Searches of Medline, Embase, Scopus, and GeoBase were completed up to February 14, 2025. Studies were eligible if they reported quantitative associations between air pollution and exposures and chronic cough outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened studies, assessed quality, and extracted data. Random-effects models were used to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Of 1250 articles screened, 53 studies were reviewed, and eight were included in meta-analysis. Pooled ORs per 10 μg/m3 increase in exposure were 1.10 (95% CI: 0.99-1.22) for PM2.5 and 1.04 (95% CI: 1.02-1.06) for NO2. Heterogeneity was low to moderate (I2: 18.9% for PM2.5; I2: 0.0% for NO2), and there was no evidence of publication bias (Egger's test p = 0.98 and 0.47, respectively). Stratified analyses revealed stronger associations in adults and males. Evidence on progression from chronic cough to more severe respiratory conditions was limited, highlighting a critical gap for evidence-informed clinical follow-up and public guidance to prevent progression. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight that chronic cough is an overlooked consequence of air pollution exposure and emphasize the need for health care professionals to consider environmental factors when managing persistent cough. Strengthening air quality control and early detection strategies could help reduce the respiratory disease burden.

References

  1. 1.Kim, H., Lai, K., Cisse, T., Wei, X., & Ge, E. (2026). Association between air pollution and chronic cough: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Environmental Research, 124108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2026.124108
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service