Artificial Liver Support Effectively Removes Immunosuppressive Bile Acids From Circulation in Patients With Severe Liver Failure: A Proof of Concept Study
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Patients with severe liver failure (bilirubin > 12 mg/dL) as defined by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment hepatic sub-score |
| I — Intervention | Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) and open albumin dialysis (OPAL) artificial liver support systems |
| C — Comparator | Head-to-head comparison between MARS and OPAL in crossover design |
| O — Outcomes | Reduction in bilirubin, total and individual bile acids, TGR5 activation, and restoration of albumin function |
Bottom Line
This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that artificial liver support systems can effectively remove immunosuppressive bile acids from patients with severe liver failure, with OPAL showing superior performance over MARS. While the biochemical findings are promising and provide mechanistic insights into potential therapeutic targets, the clinical significance remains unclear. The study lacks patient-centred outcomes such as mortality, infection rates, or clinical improvement. The borderline statistical significance (p=0.051) and absence of confidence intervals limit confidence in the findings. Before clinical implementation, larger studies with clinical endpoints, safety data, and cost-effectiveness analysis are needed. The work represents an important step toward understanding bile acid-mediated immunosuppression in liver failure, but translation to improved patient outcomes requires further investigation.
Key Findings
P Value: 0.051 for between-group comparison
Effect Size: 60% reduction with OPAL vs 39% reduction with MARS
Primary Outcome: Reduction in TGR5 activation by circulating bile acids
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not calculable from available data
Confidence Interval: Not reported
Clinical Application
Both MARS and OPAL are available in major Australian tertiary centres, though OPAL may require additional expertise Relevant to Australian liver transplant centres and ICUs. Neither technology specifically PBS-listed but available through hospital funding. Aligns with ANZICS guidelines for liver failure management ICU patients with severe liver failure and bilirubin >12 mg/dL requiring artificial liver support
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Bile acids that induce immunosuppression through activation of the Takeda G protein-coupled receptor 5 (TGR5) have recently been identified in the circulation of patients with liver failure and sepsis. These bile acids are associated with increased susceptibility to infection and a high short-term mortality. Furthermore, TGR5 activation by bile acids has been implicated in the development of pruritus. However, therapies targeting TGR5-activating bile acids in patients have not yet been reported. This study investigates the effects of two artificial liver support systems, the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) and the open albumin dialysis (OPAL). DESIGN: Proof of concept study, multicenter study. SETTING: University Hospital Jena, University Hospital Ulm, and University Hospital Münster, Germany. PATIENTS: Patients with severe liver failure, as defined by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment hepatic sub-score (i.e., bilirubin > 12 mg/dL). INTERVENTIONS: Patients with severe liver failure were randomized to receive one session of MARS or OPAL for 8 hours, followed by crossover to the other treatment on the next day. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Bilirubin, circulating total and individual bile acids, albumin function, and TGR5 activation induced by circulating bile acids were assessed before and after each treatment session. Both OPAL and MARS significantly removed bilirubin, as well as individual and total bile acids from circulation. OPAL was superior to MARS in removing protein-bound lipophilic bile acids and restoring patients' albumin function (i.e., albumin-binding capacity, detoxification efficiency, and binding efficiency). TGR5 activation induced by circulating bile acids was reduced by 60% with OPAL compared with 39% with MARS (median values, p = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: Artificial liver support systems effectively remove immunosuppressive bile acids from circulation. The clinical implications of bile acid reduction, however, require further study.
References
- 1.Leonhardt, J., Schmidt, H. H., Koball, S., Dollinger, M., Wilms, C., Neugebauer, S., Kunze, J., Kiehntopf, M., Hinz, M., Backhus, J., Henschel, J., Klammt, S., Sponholz, C., Dominik, A., Mitzner, S., Stange, J., Bauer, M., & Kortgen, A. (2026). Artificial liver support effectively removes immunosuppressive bile acids from circulation in patients with severe liver failure: A proof of concept study. Critical Care Explorations. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001419
Related Research
Journal of critical care
Artificial intelligence and computerized decision support in adult intensive care: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
3 Aug 2026
Current opinion in critical care
Smart feeding: the role of artificial intelligence and integrated nutrition platforms in the ICU
2 Aug 2026
Brain and behavior
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Poor Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
1 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service