Research AppraisalSystematic Review

Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Prognostic and Diagnostic Assessments in Peripheral Artery Disease: A Scoping Review

AngiologyGoffart, Sebastien, Delingette, Hervé, Chierici, Andrea et al.1 Apr 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

55CEBM
Evidence: ModerateSystematic Review

PICO Framework

P — PopulationPatients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) or at risk of PAD
I — InterventionArtificial intelligence techniques (machine learning, natural language processing, advanced imaging analysis)
C — ComparatorTraditional diagnostic and prognostic methods or no comparator (scoping review)
O — OutcomesDiagnostic accuracy, prognostic prediction, clinical outcomes in PAD management

Bottom Line

This scoping review examines artificial intelligence applications in peripheral artery disease diagnosis and prognosis. While PAD remains under-diagnosed with challenging prognostic assessment, AI techniques including machine learning and natural language processing show promise for improving clinical management. The review identifies significant methodological challenges including dataset variability, model complexity, and interpretability issues that limit current clinical implementation. The authors highlight the need for standardized performance metrics and better integration into clinical decision support systems. For Australian clinicians, this represents an emerging field requiring careful validation before routine clinical adoption, with particular attention to TGA regulatory requirements for AI diagnostic tools.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • Effect Size: Not applicable - scoping review

  • Primary Outcome: Identification and characterization of AI techniques for PAD diagnosis and prognosis

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Performance metrics discussed but specific values not provided in abstract

  • Confidence Interval: Not provided

Clinical Application

Implementation challenges include model interpretability, dataset variability, and integration into clinical workflows Relevant to Australian vascular surgery and cardiology practice; TGA approval would be required for AI diagnostic tools; potential PBS implications for cost-effective screening Patients with suspected or confirmed PAD requiring diagnostic or prognostic assessment

Abstract

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a major public health concern worldwide, associated with high risk of mortality and morbidity related to cardiovascular and adverse limb events. Despite significant advances in both medical and interventional therapies, PAD often remains under-diagnosed, and the prognosis of patients can be difficult to predict. Artificial intelligence (AI) has brought a wide range of opportunities to improve the management of cardiovascular diseases, from advanced imaging analysis to machine-learning (ML)-based predictive models, and medical data management using natural language processing (NLP). The aim of this review is to summarize and discuss current techniques based on AI that have been proposed for the diagnosis and the evaluation of the prognosis in patients with PAD. The review focused on clinical studies that proposed AI-methods for the detection and the classification of PAD as well as studies that used AI-models to predict outcomes of patients. Through evaluation of study design, we discuss model choices including variability in dataset inputs, model complexity, interpretability, and challenges linked to performance metrics used. In the light of the results, we discuss potential interest for clinical decision support and highlight future directions for research and clinical practice.

References

  1. 1.Goffart, S., Delingette, H., Chierici, A., Guzzi, L., Nasr, B., Lareyre, F., & Raffort, J. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Prognostic and Diagnostic Assessments in Peripheral Artery Disease: A Scoping Review. Angiology. https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197241310572
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service