Research Appraisalother

Artificial Intelligence in Neuropathic Pain: From Mechanisms to Neuromodulation and Regenerative Strategies

Current pain and headache reportsLo Bianco, Giuliano, Deer, Timothy R, Occhigrossi, Felice et al.12 June 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

60CEBM
Evidence: Moderateother

PICO Framework

P — PopulationPatients with neuropathic pain
I — InterventionArtificial intelligence and machine learning applications
C — ComparatorTraditional clinical approaches to neuropathic pain management
O — OutcomesPatient phenotyping, treatment selection, outcome prediction, neuromodulation effectiveness, and regenerative therapy outcomes

Bottom Line

This narrative review highlights promising applications of artificial intelligence in neuropathic pain management, from patient phenotyping to treatment selection and neuromodulation programming. While ML-based approaches show potential for personalising care and improving outcomes, the evidence base remains largely retrospective and single-centre. The authors appropriately emphasise that robust prospective validation, transparent reporting, and ethical safeguards are essential before clinical implementation. For Australian practitioners, these technologies may eventually enhance spinal cord stimulation programs and chronic pain services, but current evidence is insufficient to change practice. The field requires systematic research with appropriate controls before AI can be considered ready for routine clinical deployment in neuropathic pain management.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not applicable for narrative review

  • Effect Size: Not quantified - narrative synthesis only

  • Primary Outcome: AI shows promise across neuropathic pain management domains but requires validation

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: 24-month sustained benefit reported for SCS in real-world cohorts

  • Confidence Interval: Not provided

Clinical Application

Currently limited by single-centre studies and lack of prospective validation Relevant to Australian pain services, particularly for SCS programs under PBS item 39130. TGA approval would be required for AI-guided medical devices. Aligns with RACGP chronic pain management guidelines emphasising multimodal approaches Patients with heterogeneous neuropathic pain conditions requiring personalised treatment approaches

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Neuropathic pain remains challenging due to its heterogeneous mechanisms and variable treatment response. This narrative review evaluates recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) for patient phenotyping, treatment selection, outcome prediction, neuromodulation, and regenerative therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: ML-based phenotyping integrates genomic, neuroimaging, sensory, and behavioral data. Multimodal automatic pain assessment is approaching clinical deployment, supported by recent expert consensus. Large language models have been benchmarked against multidisciplinary teams for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) candidate selection. Real-world cohort data confirm sustained 24-month SCS benefit. AI is increasingly applied to regenerative interventions, including pulsed radiofrequency, which is now linked to epigenetic remodeling of dorsal root ganglion pathways. Most studies remain single-center and retrospective. AI may enable mechanism-based stratification, individualized neuromodulation programming, and rational integration of regenerative therapies in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Robust prospective validation, transparent reporting, and ethical safeguards are required before approaching translational maturity in selected settings.

References

  1. 1.Lo Bianco, G., Deer, T. R., Occhigrossi, F., Diwan, S., Mercieri, M., D'Angelo, F. P., Martinez, S. M., Day, M. R., Navani, A., & Abd-Elsayed, A. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in Neuropathic Pain: From Mechanisms to Neuromodulation and Regenerative Strategies. Current Pain and Headache Reports. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13030636
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service