Research AppraisalSystematic Review

Artificial intelligence applications in OCT and OCTA for diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review

Experimental eye researchTavakoli, Meysam, Ramezanzadeh, Esmat1 July 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

40CEBM
Evidence: WeakSystematic Review

PICO Framework

P — PopulationPatients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) or at risk of DR, imaged using optical coherence tomography (OCT) or OCT angiography (OCTA)
I — InterventionArtificial intelligence (AI) methods, particularly deep learning (DL) models including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), Vision Transformers (ViTs), and encoder-decoder architectures (e.g., U-Net), applied to OCT/OCTA images
C — ComparatorTraditional machine learning (ML) methods, human graders, or other non-DL approaches; comparisons across model architectures and imaging modalities
O — OutcomesDiagnostic performance metrics for DR detection, classification, and segmentation — including AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and detection of key biomarkers (microaneurysms, macular edema, neovascularization)

Bottom Line

This systematic review synthesises 175 studies examining AI applications in OCT and OCTA imaging for diabetic retinopathy, reporting AUC values of 0.90–0.99 for deep learning models across classification and segmentation tasks. While the breadth of literature coverage is commendable, the review is fundamentally limited by the absence of formal meta-analysis, no pooled effect sizes or confidence intervals, and no reported quality appraisal using validated tools such as QUADAS-2 or PROBAST. The impressive AUC range must be interpreted cautiously — it reflects a narrative summary across heterogeneous studies with variable dataset sizes, annotation quality, and validation approaches, many of which are likely subject to publication bias and overfitting. The authors appropriately acknowledge that cross-institutional validation, model interpretability, and dataset limitations remain unresolved. For Australian clinicians, OCT is already embedded in DR monitoring practice, but AI-assisted analysis tools have not yet received TGA regulatory approval and are not reimbursed under MBS. This review confirms the field's technical promise but does not provide sufficient evidence to change clinical practice. Senior clinicians should await prospective, multicentre validation studies with GRADE-assessed evidence before considering AI-OCT tools as adjuncts to standard DR grading workflows.

Evidence: Weak

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not reported

  • Effect Size: AUC values typically ranging from 0.90 to 0.99 for DL-based classification and segmentation tasks; DL consistently outperformed traditional ML methods

  • Primary Outcome: Diagnostic performance of AI/DL models for DR detection, classification, and segmentation using OCT and OCTA images across 175 included studies

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Specific sensitivity and specificity values not reported in abstract; AUC range of 0.90–0.99 implies high discriminative performance but individual study metrics are not synthesised. CNNs, ViTs, and U-Net architectures identified as consistently strong performers across DR biomarker detection tasks

  • Confidence Interval: Not reported — no pooled meta-analytic estimates provided

Clinical Application

Clinical implementation remains premature. Key barriers include: lack of prospective real-world validation studies; model interpretability concerns limiting clinician trust; absence of standardised datasets for benchmarking; and significant variability in performance across imaging devices and clinical settings. Integration with existing retinal imaging workflows would require substantial health informatics infrastructure. Australia has a high burden of diabetic retinopathy, with approximately 1.3 million Australians living with diabetes and DR representing a leading cause of preventable blindness. The RACGP recommends annual retinal examination for all people with diabetes. OCT is Medicare-rebatable (MBS item numbers 11215, 11216) and widely available in Australian ophthalmology and optometry practices. OCTA is less widely reimbursed. The TGA would need to evaluate and register any AI-based DR diagnostic software as a Class IIa or IIb medical device under the Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) framework before clinical deployment. No TGA-approved AI DR screening tool using OCT/OCTA is currently listed on the ARTG as of early 2026. Indigenous Australians have disproportionately high rates of DR and limited access to specialist eye care — AI-assisted screening could theoretically address this equity gap, but only if validated in this population, which current evidence does not support. The National Diabetes Services Scheme (NDSS) and KeepSight programme provide relevant infrastructure for future integration. Adults with diabetes mellitus undergoing retinal screening or monitoring for diabetic retinopathy, particularly in settings where OCT or OCTA imaging is available. Most applicable to secondary and tertiary ophthalmology care settings; potential future application in primary care diabetic eye screening programmes.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of vision impairment worldwide. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) provide detailed retinal imaging, enabling early detection of microvascular changes. This study aims to systematically review artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning (DL), applications for DR detection and analysis using OCT and OCTA images. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and Embase for studies published up to March 2026. A total of 1007 articles were identified, of which 175 studies met the inclusion criteria following the PRISMA study selection process. RESULTS: DL-based approaches consistently demonstrated superior performance compared to traditional machine learning (ML) methods, with reported AUC values typically ranging from 0.90 to 0.99 across classification and segmentation tasks. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), Vision Transformers (ViTs), and encoder-decoder architectures such as U-Net showed strong performance in detecting key DR biomarkers, including microaneurysms, macular edema, and neovascularization. However, performance variability was observed depending on dataset size, imaging modality, and annotation quality. CONCLUSIONS: AI-driven analysis of OCT and OCTA images offers significant potential for automated DR detection. Despite promising results, challenges such as limited public datasets, lack of cross-institutional validation, and model interpretability remain. Future research should focus on multimodal integration, explainable AI, and large-scale validation to enhance clinical applicability.

References

  1. 1.Tavakoli, M., & Ramezanzadeh, E. (2026). Artificial intelligence applications in OCT and OCTA for diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review. Experimental Eye Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2026.111046
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service