Artificial intelligence and multi-omics convergence in breast cancer: Revolutionizing diagnosis, prognostication, and precision oncology
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Women with breast cancer across various stages and subtypes |
| I — Intervention | Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics integration (genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics) combined with imaging and clinical data |
| C — Comparator | Traditional single-modality analyses and conventional diagnostic/prognostic approaches |
| O — Outcomes | Diagnostic accuracy, prognostic stratification, treatment response prediction, biomarker identification, and clinical decision support |
Bottom Line
This narrative review examines the potential of artificial intelligence to integrate multi-omics data for breast cancer management. While the authors present a comprehensive overview of current approaches spanning genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, the review lacks systematic methodology and provides no quantitative synthesis of evidence. The authors appropriately acknowledge significant barriers to clinical translation, including cross-platform variability, missing data challenges, and limited interpretability of AI models. Most concerning is the absence of prospective validation studies demonstrating clinical utility. For Australian clinicians, while these technologies show promise, they remain experimental and are not ready for routine clinical implementation. The review serves as a useful primer on emerging technologies but should not influence current practice decisions. Clinicians should await properly designed prospective studies with clinically relevant endpoints before considering adoption of multi-omics AI tools.
Key Findings
P Value: Not applicable - no statistical pooling
Effect Size: Not quantified - narrative synthesis only
Primary Outcome: Multi-omics AI integration shows promise for improved breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis but faces significant clinical translation barriers
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Individual studies report improved accuracy over unimodal approaches but no pooled diagnostic performance metrics
Confidence Interval: Not applicable - no meta-analysis performed
Clinical Application
Currently limited by technical barriers, data standardisation issues, and lack of prospective validation Relevant to Australian breast cancer care but implementation would require TGA approval for AI diagnostic tools and integration with existing pathology workflows. Cost-effectiveness analysis needed for PBS consideration. Women with breast cancer requiring diagnostic workup, prognostic stratification, or treatment selection
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is a highly heterogeneous malignancy and remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Advances in multi-omics profiling spanning genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, and metabolomics have enabled finer subtype stratification and more comprehensive characterisation of tumour biology, thereby accelerating the discovery of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and actionable therapeutic targets. Nonetheless, translating multi-layer molecular signals into clinically robust decision support remains challenging because of the high dimensionality and heterogeneity of omics data, cross-cohort and cross-platform variability, and the fragmentation inherent to single-modality analyses. This review summarises how multi-omics studies have refined BC subtype definitions and advanced biomarker and target identification, and then synthesises recent progress in artificial intelligence, particularly deep learning, for integrating multi-omics with imaging, pathology, and clinical variables to improve diagnosis, risk stratification, prognosis prediction, and treatment response assessment. We critically examine representative multimodal integration frameworks and emerging deep learning architectures that learn both shared and modality-specific representations, which in many settings enable more accurate patient-level prediction than unimodal baselines. We further delineate key barriers to clinical translation, including cross-centre heterogeneity and inconsistent endpoint definitions, structural missingness of modalities in real-world workflows, inadequate cross-platform normalisation, limited interpretability and auditability, and a lack of prospective validation. Finally, we propose realistic next steps, including standardised and auditable preprocessing pipelines, missingness-aware fusion strategies, explainable and uncertainty-aware modelling, privacy-preserving multi-centre learning, and prospective, workflow-based evaluation. Collectively, these perspectives provide a roadmap for advancing multimodal AI-multi-omics integration toward reliable clinical deployment in BC management.
References
- 1.Jiang, B., Wu, Y., Chen, X., Jian, C., & Wang, W. (2026). Artificial intelligence and multi-omics convergence in breast cancer: Revolutionizing diagnosis, prognostication, and precision oncology. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 105160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2026.105160
Related Research
Cancer medicine
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1 Aug 2026
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
User perceptions of machine learning models as decision support for colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team conferences (AID-SIM-2): a qualitative simulation study.
1 Aug 2026
Journal of breast imaging
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
30 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service