Artificial intelligence and machine learning in smart vaginal formulation development
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Women requiring vaginal drug delivery systems, including those with conditions such as bacterial vaginosis, sexually transmitted infections, contraceptive needs, and other gynaecological indications |
| I — Intervention | Application of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods in the design, optimisation, and development of vaginal drug delivery formulations (mucoadhesive, mucus-penetrating, bio-responsive, and controlled-release systems) |
| C — Comparator | Conventional (non-AI/ML-assisted) vaginal formulation development approaches |
| O — Outcomes | Predictability, efficiency, reproducibility, and personalisation of vaginal formulation development; therapeutic outcomes; patient adherence; regulatory and ethical considerations |
Bottom Line
This narrative review maps the emerging intersection of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and vaginal drug delivery — a clinically important but methodologically underdeveloped field. The authors make a compelling case that biological variability in the vaginal microenvironment (pH, microbiota, hormonal fluctuations) is a genuine barrier to consistent therapeutic outcomes with conventional formulations, and that data-driven approaches could theoretically improve formulation design and personalisation. However, the review itself is not a systematic review: it lacks a registered protocol, systematic search strategy, risk of bias assessment, quantitative synthesis, or GRADE evaluation. Its CEBM score of 15/100 reflects these methodological limitations rather than the importance of the topic. The evidence base for AI/ML in vaginal drug delivery is self-described as early-stage, and no clinical trial data demonstrating patient benefit are synthesised. For Australian clinicians and researchers, this review is best read as a well-informed horizon-scanning exercise identifying future research priorities, not as a basis for practice change. Pharmaceutical scientists, women's health researchers, and regulatory scientists — including those engaging with TGA frameworks for AI in therapeutics — will find the conceptual framework and identification of technical challenges most useful.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported
Effect Size: Not applicable — no quantitative effect sizes reported; conclusions are narrative and directional, indicating that AI/ML integration 'can enhance predictability, efficiency, and reproducibility' in vaginal formulation development
Primary Outcome: Qualitative synthesis of the current and potential role of AI/ML in vaginal drug delivery formulation design, optimisation, and personalisation
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not applicable — no clinical trial data or diagnostic accuracy data synthesised; no NNT, sensitivity, specificity, or hazard ratios calculable from this review
Confidence Interval: Not reported — no meta-analytic synthesis performed
Clinical Application
Clinical implementation of AI/ML-designed personalised vaginal formulations remains a future aspiration rather than a current clinical reality. Barriers include: limited high-quality training datasets for vaginal microenvironment modelling; regulatory uncertainty regarding AI/ML-assisted pharmaceutical development pathways; manufacturing scalability of personalised formulations; cost and accessibility, particularly in resource-limited settings; and the need for prospective clinical validation of AI/ML-optimised products. Digital health monitoring integration (e.g., vaginal biosensors) adds further technical and regulatory complexity. In Australia, vaginal drug delivery products are regulated by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) under the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG). The TGA has begun engaging with AI/ML in medical device regulation but has not yet published specific guidance for AI/ML-assisted pharmaceutical formulation development. Relevant PBS-listed vaginal products include clindamycin cream and metronidazole gel for bacterial vaginosis, and various antifungal preparations. The RACGP and RANZCOG guidelines for vaginal infections and menopausal management do not currently incorporate AI/ML-guided formulation selection. Australian women's health research priorities, including Indigenous women's health equity and high rates of bacterial vaginosis in remote communities, represent important population-specific considerations that AI/ML personalisation approaches could theoretically address but have not yet been studied in this context. The review's findings are relevant to Australian pharmaceutical researchers and women's health clinicians as a horizon-scanning resource rather than a guide to immediate practice change. Women across the reproductive lifespan requiring vaginal drug delivery for indications including bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal candidiasis, sexually transmitted infection prevention (including HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis), contraception, menopausal hormone therapy, and cervical cancer treatment. Biological variability in vaginal pH, microbiota (particularly Lactobacillus-dominant versus dysbiotic communities), and hormonal milieu are identified as key patient-level factors that AI/ML approaches aim to address.
Abstract
Vaginal drug delivery in women's health remains underutilized and insufficiently studied, largely due to the complexity and dynamic nature of the vaginal microenvironment. Variations in vaginal pH, hormonal levels, and microbiota composition introduce significant biological variability, complicating formulation design and contributing to inconsistent therapeutic outcomes and poor patient adherence. Conventional vaginal formulations often fail to account for these individual differences, highlighting the need for more adaptive and predictive approaches. Emerging advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offer promising strategies to address these challenges by enabling multi-parameter, data-driven formulation development that explicitly considers biological variability. Despite their transformative potential, the application of AI and ML in vaginal drug delivery remains limited. This review addresses this gap by examining the emerging role of AI/ML in the design, optimization, and development of next-generation vaginal formulations, including mucoadhesive, mucus-penetrating, bio-responsive, and controlled-release systems. Key factors influencing formulation performance, such as vaginal microbiota composition, are discussed, and ethical, regulatory, and technical challenges relevant to integrating AI/ML into vaginal drug delivery are also considered. Although research is in its early stages, existing studies indicate that AI and ML integration can enhance predictability, efficiency, and reproducibility in vaginal formulation development. Finally, we highlight the potential of developing personalized medicines through the integration of AI/ML and digital health monitoring devices to create patient-centered vaginal drug delivery systems, thereby advancing therapeutic outcomes and transforming women's health.
References
- 1.Ogundemuren, D. A., Agrahari, V., Wong, A. P., Herrera, C., Ilomuanya, M. O., & Doncel, G. F. (2026). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in smart vaginal formulation development. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2026.115882
Related Research
Current psychiatry reports
Postpartum Suicidality beyond Depression: a Systematic Review of Risk Profiles and Prevention Gaps
28 July 2026
Medicine
Risk factors for episiotomy during vaginal birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis
13 July 2026
BMJ open
Determinants of cervical screening in Ghana: a systematic review
11 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service