Analysis of swimming teaching programs, aquatic competencies and specific skills in school settings from early childhood to secondary education: A systematic review.
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | School-aged children and adolescents from early childhood (infant) through to secondary education enrolled in formal school settings |
| I — Intervention | Structured swimming teaching programmes and aquatic competency curricula implemented within school contexts over the last 25 years |
| C — Comparator | No single active comparator specified; studies compared across different programme types, pedagogical approaches, durations, frequencies, and educational stages |
| O — Outcomes | Aquatic competencies acquired, specific swimming skills developed, curricular integration, pedagogical approaches employed, assessment instruments used, and programme characteristics (duration, frequency, content) |
Bottom Line
This systematic review of 16 studies examines school-based swimming teaching programmes across early childhood to secondary education over 25 years. Using PRISMA methodology and dual quality appraisal tools (STROBE and TREND), the authors identify a consistent pattern of technically-focused, poorly integrated aquatic education with high variability in programme design and limited secondary school representation. The review is methodologically sound in its search and selection processes but is substantially limited by its small evidence base, purely narrative synthesis, absence of meta-analytic pooling, and lack of formal GRADE certainty assessment. No quantitative effect sizes are reported, and drowning prevention outcomes — the primary public health rationale for school swimming — are not directly addressed. For Australian clinicians and public health practitioners, the findings reinforce existing concerns about inconsistent implementation of school aquatic education, despite a strong national policy framework. The review is best interpreted as a landscape analysis and research agenda document rather than a practice-changing evidence synthesis. It appropriately calls for greater institutional support, standardised curricula, and teacher training, but the evidence base is currently insufficient to support specific programmatic recommendations. Further high-quality, prospectively registered studies with standardised outcome measurement are needed.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported
Effect Size: Not applicable — no meta-analytic pooling performed; findings are descriptive and narrative
Primary Outcome: Predominance of technical-utilitarian pedagogical approaches focused on specific swimming skills, with limited curricular integration and restricted involvement of physical education teachers across school-based aquatic programmes
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not applicable for this review type; no NNT, sensitivity, specificity, or hazard ratio calculable from the reported data
Confidence Interval: Not reported — narrative synthesis only
Clinical Application
Implementation of more comprehensive, curricularly integrated aquatic education programmes is feasible in well-resourced school systems with access to aquatic facilities, but requires significant institutional commitment, teacher training investment, and policy-level support. The review highlights that current implementation is fragmented and inconsistent, suggesting substantial barriers remain in most school systems. Australia has a strong national imperative for school-based swimming education given its high drowning mortality burden — drowning is a leading cause of preventable death in children under 14 years (Royal Life Saving Society Australia data). Swimming and water safety is embedded in the Australian Curriculum (Health and Physical Education learning area, F–10) and most state education systems mandate swimming programmes at primary school level. The RACGP and public health bodies support water safety education as a preventive health priority. This review's findings — highlighting fragmented implementation, limited secondary school coverage, and absence of standardised assessment — are directly relevant to ongoing debates in Australian education policy about the adequacy of school swimming programmes. The TGA and PBS are not directly relevant to this non-pharmacological, educational intervention. State-based aquatic education frameworks (e.g., NSW Department of Education Learn to Swim programmes, Surf Life Saving Australia school programmes) represent the Australian implementation context most analogous to the programmes reviewed. School-aged children and adolescents (approximately 3–18 years) enrolled in formal education settings where swimming instruction is delivered or being considered as part of the physical education curriculum
Abstract
The teaching of swimming in school contexts has become increasingly important due to the benefits in the integral development of students and the prevention of aquatic accidents.This study analyses, by means of a systematic review, the aquatic teaching programmes and Competencies implemented in school settings over the last 25 years, from infant to secondary education. The Methodological approach was based on the PRISMA guidelines, with searches in scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, Sport Discus and Web of Science) and secondary sources. Sixteen studies were selected according to the PICOS model, assessed with the STROBE and TREND tools. The results show a predominance of technical-utilitarian approaches focused on specific swimming skills, with little curricular integration and limited involvement of PE teachers. Most of the studies focused on infant and primary school, being scarce in secondary school. A high variability in duration, frequency, Contents and Assessment instruments was evidenced. The studies highlight the need for greater inclusion of swimming in school curricula, with more comprehensive pedagogical approaches adapted to each stage. It is concluded that although progress has been made, systematic implementation is still limited, requiring greater institutional support, teacher training and methodological coherence.
References
- 1.Trinidad, A., Mendoza-Castejón, D., de la Calle, L. M., & Del-Blanco-Muñiz, J. Á. (2026). Analysis of swimming teaching programs, aquatic competencies and specific skills in school settings from early childhood to secondary education: A systematic review. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353477
Related Research
PloS one
Integrating smoking cessation into HIV care settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and the evidence gap in cost-effectiveness.
1 Aug 2026
BMJ open ophthalmology
Screening for diabetic retinopathy with artificial intelligence in a primary care setting: a comparative cost analysis
1 Aug 2026
Preventing chronic disease
Reducing Rates of Cesarean Delivery in Rural US Communities: A Systematic Review of Interventions and Approaches to Care
31 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service