Research Appraisalother

An Interactive Digital Dashboard for Patient Monitoring and Management in a Continuity of Care Centre: Development and Preliminary Usability Evaluation Study

JMIR formative researchDachena, Chiara, Gatta, Roberto, Franceschini, Lorenzo et al.12 June 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

60CEBM
Evidence: Weakother

PICO Framework

P — PopulationHealthcare professionals (nurses, physicians, administrative staff) working in a Continuity of Care Centre
I — InterventionInteractive digital dashboard for patient monitoring and management
C — ComparatorNo explicit comparator - single-arm development and evaluation study
O — OutcomesSystem usability (SUS score), user interaction satisfaction (QUIS), and situation awareness (SAI)

Bottom Line

This Italian study describes the development and preliminary evaluation of a digital dashboard for patient monitoring in a continuity of care centre. While the dashboard achieved acceptable usability scores using validated instruments, the study has significant limitations including a very small sample size (n=15), single-centre design, and lack of clinical outcome measures. The System Usability Scale score of 61.5 indicates 'OK to good' usability, but this falls short of the threshold typically considered for excellent usability (≥80). The study provides useful insights for healthcare informatics teams developing similar tools, but the evidence is insufficient to support widespread implementation without further validation. Australian healthcare organisations considering similar dashboards should conduct larger, multi-site evaluations that include clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness analyses. The positive user feedback suggests potential value, but more robust evidence is needed before recommending adoption in routine clinical practice.

Evidence: Weak

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not reported - no statistical testing performed

  • Effect Size: Median QUIS score 5.77 (IQR 4-7) with highest scores in usability (6.33) and learning (6.01)

  • Primary Outcome: System Usability Scale score of 61.5 (SD 15.7) indicating 'OK to good' usability

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Situation Awareness Index score of 4 points with highest familiarity (4.73) and arousal support (4.6) scores

  • Confidence Interval: Not reported

Clinical Application

Moderate - requires integration with existing hospital information systems and staff training Relevant to Australian continuity of care models; would need adaptation to local EMR systems and compliance with Australian Digital Health Agency standards Healthcare teams in continuity of care settings, particularly those managing patient transitions and monitoring

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical dashboards are becoming important tools for managing and monitoring hospitalized patients across different wards. Moreover, careful attention to design, usability, and user interaction is essential for developing effective support tools for clinicians. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the development, implementation, and preliminary evaluation of an interactive dashboard for patient monitoring and management in the Continuity of Care Centre (CCC). METHODS: We developed a dashboard according to clinicians' requests and the daily workflow of case managers. First, a CCC Data Mart was created to collect all patients' information automatically extracted from the hospital's data warehouse. However, case managers had the possibility to enter additional patient information in the dashboard using a dedicated form. Moreover, CCC physicians, nurses, and administrative staff were surveyed using 2 validated questionnaires, the System Usability Scale and the Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction. The Situation Awareness Index was proposed to evaluate user awareness and task efficiency. RESULTS: The first version of the CCC dashboard presented 4 panels with different types of information, both on the individual patient and on metrics related to the overall patient population. The first panel focused on patients' data, such as demographic factors, admission, transfer, discharge wards (and their dates), etc. The importance of this panel was the possibility of viewing information collected from different sources within a single interface. The other 3 panels displayed different key performance indicators for the overall patient population and presented data both in the form of tables in the second panel and graphs in the third and fourth panels. After 3 months of daily use, a total of 15 participants, 10 nurses, 2 administrative staff members, and 3 physicians, were recruited for the dashboard evaluation. The average System Usability Scale score of the dashboard was 61.5 (SD 15.7) points, which indicates "OK to good" usability, and the median score obtained with the Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction was 5.77 (IQR 4-7), with the highest results in usability (mean 6.33, SD 0) and learning (mean 6.01, SD 0.39). The overall Situation Awareness Index score was 4 points, with the highest score in "familiarity of dashboard" (mean 4.73, SD 1.66 points) and "arousal support" (mean 4.6, SD 1.8 points). CONCLUSIONS: We developed an interactive dashboard for patient monitoring and management, with positive evaluations from users across different questionnaires.

References

  1. 1.Dachena, C., Gatta, R., Franceschini, L., Del Vicario, M. A., Serra, M. L., Acampora, N., Marchetti, A., Arcuri, G., Patarnello, S., Masciocchi, C., Onder, G., Landi, F., & Barillaro, C. (2026). An Interactive Digital Dashboard for Patient Monitoring and Management in a Continuity of Care Centre: Development and Preliminary Usability Evaluation Study. JMIR Formative Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/81480
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service