Air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: A systematic review of fine critical windows
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Pregnant women and their infants exposed to outdoor air pollution |
| I — Intervention | Exposure to outdoor air pollutants (PM2.5, PM10, NO2, O3) during specific critical windows of pregnancy |
| C — Comparator | Lower exposure levels or different timing of exposure during pregnancy |
| O — Outcomes | Adverse pregnancy outcomes including prematurity, low birth weight, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, gestational hypertension, and stillbirth |
Bottom Line
This systematic review examined critical windows of air pollution exposure during pregnancy and adverse outcomes. From 3,631 articles, only 20 studies met inclusion criteria, all from China or the United States. The most consistent finding was that weeks 17-28 of pregnancy represent a critical window for preterm birth risk from air pollution exposure. However, significant heterogeneity between studies and limited geographic representation restrict the generalisability of findings. The review highlights the importance of timing in environmental exposure assessment but provides insufficient evidence to change current clinical practice. The lack of studies addressing several pre-specified outcomes and absence of quantitative meta-analysis further limit clinical utility. While the concept of critical windows is scientifically important, more diverse, high-quality studies are needed before translating these findings into specific clinical recommendations for pregnancy care.
Key Findings
P Value: Not applicable for systematic review
Effect Size: Not quantified - narrative synthesis only
Primary Outcome: Critical windows of air pollution exposure for adverse pregnancy outcomes
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Most consistent finding: weeks 17-28 of pregnancy identified as critical window for preterm birth
Confidence Interval: Not provided
Clinical Application
Findings could inform timing of environmental interventions and patient counselling during pregnancy Limited direct applicability to Australian populations given geographic restriction of included studies. Australian air quality standards and exposure patterns may differ significantly from China and US contexts Pregnant women in areas with significant air pollution exposure, particularly those in urban environments
Abstract
Epidemiological studies have reported associations between prenatal exposure to outdoor air pollution and adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, most analyses assessed exposure over the entire pregnancy or by trimester, potentially missing specific critical windows of vulnerability that recent statistical methods can identify. The objective of this study was to summarise studies examining critical windows of exposure to outdoor air pollution in relation to adverse pregnancy outcomes. This systematic review (PROSPERO-CRD42024523345) followed PRISMA recommendations using PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL databases. The search was performed on April 2024 and udpated on February 2025. Eligible studies analysed critical windows of association between air pollutants (PM2.5, PM10, NO2, O3) and the following outcomes: prematurity, low birth weight, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, gestational hypertension and stillbirth. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full texts. Results were synthesised narratively. Out of 3631 articles, 20 studies were included. All were conducted in China or the United States and relied almost exclusively on distributed lag models (DLM or DLNM). Heterogeneity was observed across pathologies and between studies addressing the same outcome. The most consistent finding concerned preterm birth, for which the end of the second trimester (weeks 17-28) was often identified as a critical window. No studies addressed intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy or stillbirth. Conclusions. The variability in results reflects distinct pathophysiological mechanisms, differences in exposure levels, or individual characteristics. Precisely identifying critical windows of environmental exposure during pregnancy appears essential to improve perinatal environmental prevention and guide public health action.
References
- 1.Boitel, A., Cot, S., Pujol, S., Martin, B., Mottet, N., Honorine, G. M., Mauny, F., & Bernard, N. (2026). Air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: A systematic review of fine critical windows. Environmental Research, 124294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2026.124294
Related Research
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
ChatGPT in urogynecology: Comparing large language model responses to human experts
3 Aug 2026
Ultrasound in medicine & biology
A Systematic Review: The Application of Attention Mechanisms in Medical Ultrasound Image Processing
2 Aug 2026
Preventing chronic disease
Reducing Rates of Cesarean Delivery in Rural US Communities: A Systematic Review of Interventions and Approaches to Care
31 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service