Research Appraisalother

AI in variant analysis: fast track to genetic diagnoses

Human geneticsWilk, Elizabeth J, Taluri, Sasha, Howton, Timothy C et al.26 June 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

45CEBM
Evidence: Weakother

PICO Framework

P — PopulationPatients with rare diseases undergoing genomic sequencing, particularly those with variants of uncertain significance (VUSs); clinical geneticists and genomic medicine practitioners
I — InterventionArtificial intelligence (AI)-assisted tools integrated across the genetic diagnostic workflow, including phenotyping, variant prioritisation, and interpretation support
C — ComparatorConventional manual variant analysis and interpretation without AI-assisted decision support
O — OutcomesReduction in diagnostic odyssey duration; improved variant classification accuracy; clinical actionability of genomic data; management of variants of uncertain significance; workflow efficiency and scalability

Bottom Line

This narrative review from the University of Alabama at Birmingham argues that AI-assisted tools are essential for addressing the growing interpretation gap in clinical genomics, particularly for rare disease patients burdened by variants of uncertain significance. The authors propose integrating AI across the entire diagnostic workflow — from phenotyping to variant prioritisation — and advocate for human-in-the-loop design to maintain clinical oversight. While the clinical problem is real and pressing, the review itself provides no original data, no systematic literature synthesis, and no quantitative evidence of AI tool performance. Its recommendations are expert opinion (CEBM Level 5). Clinicians should view this paper as a well-reasoned position statement rather than an evidence-based practice guideline. The discussion of upcoming ACMG v4 quantitative frameworks and the acknowledgement of training data bias, privacy risks, and model explainability challenges are valuable contributions. In the Australian context, TGA SaMD regulatory requirements and the genomic underrepresentation of First Nations peoples represent critical implementation barriers not addressed by this review. Senior clinicians should await prospective validation studies demonstrating diagnostic yield improvement and patient outcome benefit before adopting specific AI tools into routine genomic diagnostic workflows.

Evidence: Weak

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not reported

  • Effect Size: Not reported — no quantitative effect estimates are synthesised

  • Primary Outcome: Qualitative synthesis proposing AI as a scalable clinical decision-support framework to bridge the interpretation gap between genomic data generation and clinical actionability, with particular focus on variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) in rare disease patients

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not applicable — no diagnostic accuracy metrics, NNT, or hazard ratios are reported; the review does not synthesise performance characteristics of specific AI tools

  • Confidence Interval: Not reported

Clinical Application

Implementation feasibility is moderate to high in well-resourced tertiary genomic medicine centres but remains limited in primary and regional care settings due to infrastructure requirements, specialist workforce constraints, and the need for validated AI tools with regulatory approval. The authors' recommendation for intuitive workflow integration and human-in-the-loop design is pragmatically sound but requires substantial institutional investment. Australia has a growing genomic medicine infrastructure through the Australian Genomics Health Alliance and Medicare-funded genomic sequencing for specific rare disease indications. The Human Genetics Society of Australasia (HGSA) provides variant classification guidelines broadly aligned with ACMG standards, making the transition to ACMG v4 discussed in this review directly relevant. The TGA regulates software as a medical device (SaMD), meaning AI-assisted variant interpretation tools would require TGA conformity assessment before clinical deployment. The PBS does not currently fund AI-assisted genomic interpretation as a standalone service. Equity considerations are particularly salient in Australia given the genomic underrepresentation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in training datasets, a limitation the review acknowledges in general terms but does not address specifically. Patients with suspected rare genetic diseases undergoing whole genome or whole exome sequencing, particularly those receiving inconclusive results due to VUSs; clinical geneticists, genetic counsellors, and genomic medicine specialists managing complex variant interpretation

Abstract

While falling costs have expanded access to genomic sequencing, clinical utility is frequently hindered by the challenge of interpreting complex genetic data. Variant analysis for rare disease patients especially requires significant time and expertise, creating a bottleneck that delays diagnostics. Although advances in genetic variant classification have improved diagnostic precision, they have also increased the identification of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs), widening the interpretation gap between data generation and clinical actionability. The high prevalence of VUSs can lead to false reassurance or psychological distress by misinterpretting inconclusive results. We propose that artificial intelligence (AI) is a critical clinical decision-support tool for bridging this gap, offering a scalable framework to optimize variant interpretation and shorten the diagnostic odyssey. While reclassification ultimately requires biological evidence that AI cannot replace, these tools serve as essential aggregators and prioritizers, especially as guidelines transition toward the upcoming quantitative ACMG v4 framework. We advocate integrating AI throughout the genetic diagnostic workflow-from initial phenotyping to variant prioritization-to facilitate data-driven, personalized treatment. We outline current AI-assisted approaches and discuss anticipated challenges in this pursuit, such as privacy, training data bias and quality, model explainability, and the necessity of a total product life cycle for validation. To address these challenges, we provide recommendations for "human-in-the-loop" design and intuitive workflow integration to ensure AI tools meet the highest standards of precision, reproducibility, and transparency to maximize adoption. By standardizing AI across the variant analysis pipeline, we can fast-track the path to genetic diagnoses, effectively bridging the interpretation gap and enabling rapid delivery of personalized medical interventions.

References

  1. 1.Wilk, E. J., Taluri, S., Howton, T. C., Crumley, A. B., Mrug, M., & Lasseigne, B. N. (2026). AI in variant analysis: fast track to genetic diagnoses. Human Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2023.100837
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service