AI in Oral Health Surveillance: Critical Review
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | General populations and subgroups subject to oral health surveillance, including individuals screened for caries, oral hygiene status, gingivitis, oral cancer, and malocclusion |
| I — Intervention | Artificial intelligence applications (traditional machine learning, computer vision models, large language models/multimodal LLMs) applied to oral health surveillance data collection, integration, and dissemination |
| C — Comparator | Conventional oral health surveillance methods (structured epidemiological surveys, clinical examinations, traditional public health monitoring systems); no explicit active comparator in most reviewed studies |
| O — Outcomes | Population-level oral health trend mapping, identification of oral health inequities and risk factors, diagnostic accuracy of remote screening tools, feasibility of multimodal data integration, and potential for public health policy impact |
Bottom Line
This critical review from the University of Hong Kong provides a conceptually useful but methodologically limited synthesis of AI applications in oral health surveillance. It maps three AI modality domains — traditional machine learning for structured epidemiological data, computer vision for remote oral disease screening, and emerging multimodal large language models for integrated surveillance — to their respective data types and surveillance functions. The review's principal contribution is its articulation of a translational roadmap: from individual-level AI diagnostics toward scalable population surveillance systems. However, it does not meet the methodological standards of a systematic review. The absence of a registered protocol, reproducible search strategy, formal risk of bias assessment, and quantitative synthesis means its conclusions carry the evidentiary weight of expert opinion rather than synthesised evidence. Clinicians and health system planners should treat its recommendations as hypothesis-generating rather than practice-changing. For Australian practitioners, the concepts are relevant to oral health equity challenges in remote and Indigenous communities, but implementation would require TGA SaMD assessment, culturally safe data governance, and prospective validation in local populations before any surveillance programme adoption. The field is advancing rapidly, and a rigorous systematic review with meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies is now warranted.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported
Effect Size: Not reported — no pooled effect sizes are calculated; the review is qualitative and conceptual in nature
Primary Outcome: Narrative synthesis of AI applications in oral health surveillance across three domains: (1) population-level oral health trend mapping and equity analysis using traditional machine learning on structured epidemiological data; (2) remote screening of oral diseases (caries, gingivitis, oral cancer, malocclusion) from intraoral images using computer vision models; (3) multimodal data integration using large language models and multimodal LLMs for precision public health
Nnt Or Sensitivity: No NNT, sensitivity, specificity, or AUC values are pooled or reported in the abstract; individual study performance metrics referenced within the full text are not summarised in the abstract
Confidence Interval: Not reported
Clinical Application
Feasibility of immediate clinical or public health implementation is limited by the review's own identified barriers: lack of standardised imaging protocols for non-clinical settings, domain shift between training and deployment environments, class imbalance in surveillance datasets, and unresolved cost-effectiveness questions. LLM/MLLM-based multimodal surveillance systems remain largely aspirational and are not yet validated at scale. Traditional ML applications to structured epidemiological data are more mature but still require careful validation in new population contexts. Australia has established national oral health surveillance infrastructure through the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) and the Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health (ARCPOH), which conducts the National Child Oral Health Study and the National Survey of Adult Oral Health. AI-assisted tools for remote oral screening could be particularly relevant in the Australian context given the significant oral health disparities affecting rural and remote communities, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, and aged care residents with limited dental access. The Chronic Disease Dental Scheme and Child Dental Benefits Schedule (CDBS) provide frameworks within which AI-assisted triage or screening could theoretically be integrated, though no TGA-approved AI oral health surveillance tools are currently listed. RACGP guidelines on preventive oral health in primary care settings could provide a pathway for integrating AI-assisted screening referral pathways. Any deployment would require TGA regulatory assessment as a Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) under the current regulatory framework. Data sovereignty considerations, particularly for Indigenous health data, would require engagement with community-controlled health organisations and compliance with the AIATSIS Code of Ethics. Public health practitioners, dental epidemiologists, health system planners, and clinical informaticists involved in population-level oral health monitoring. Potentially applicable to screening programmes targeting high-risk groups (children, elderly, socioeconomically disadvantaged populations) where remote or AI-assisted surveillance could extend reach beyond traditional clinical settings.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) holds transformative potential for advancing oral health surveillance by streamlining data collection, integration, and dissemination. This review critically synthesizes AI applications in oral health surveillance, highlighting its roles in 1) mapping population-level trends and oral health inequities using machine learning on epidemiological data; 2) enabling remote screening of oral diseases/conditions, including caries, oral hygiene, gingivitis, oral cancer, and malocclusion from intraoral images via computer vision models; and 3) integrating multimodal data through emerging large language models (LLMs) to enhance precision public health. We clarify the comparative strengths of distinct AI modeling for processing the primary data types in surveillance: structured clinical records, unstructured images, and integrated multimodal data. Traditional machine learning methods have been effectively applied to map population-level oral health disparities and identify risk factors but are constrained to structured data. Computer vision methods excel in individual-level diagnostics using intraoral photographs. To translate such capability into scalable surveillance, it is recommended to establish standardized imaging protocols for nonclinical settings, develop scalable models for fine-grained feature extraction, and implement reliable evaluation. These steps are essential to address pervasive challenges, including inconsistent image quality, domain shift, prevalence imbalance, and cost-effectiveness constraints. The future of AI-driven oral health surveillance lies in developing dental-adapted multimodal LLMs (MLLMs). Such MLLMs are uniquely capable of synthesizing disparate data streams, from structured clinical data to heterogeneous imaging modalities (e.g., intraoral photographs and radiographs), or even biomolecular data. This integration capacity facilitates a paradigm shift, moving current applications in dental consultation and clinical decision support toward a novel, tiered system for population-level monitoring. Such a system would provide actionable insights for public health policymaking via spatiotemporal analysis and causal inference. Next-generation AI-driven oral health surveillance systems can only succeed when built on a strong foundation of rigorous ethical principles and safeguards.
References
- 1.Chen, Z., Liu, P., Han, K., Liao, P., Yang, Y., Wong, M. C. M., Yiu, C. K. Y., & Lo, E. C. M. (2026). AI in oral health surveillance: Critical review. Journal of Dental Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345261434568
Related Research
Clinical oral investigations
Effectiveness of BRIX3000 for chemo-mechanical caries removal: a systematic review and meta-analysis of time and pain outcomes
7 June 2026
Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)
Mapping sequential patterns of periodontal breakdown using longitudinal electronic health records data
22 May 2026
Calcified tissue international
Diagnostic Indices for Epidemiological Assessment of Molar Incisor Hypomineralization: A Systematic Review
11 May 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service