AI chatbots for health information seeking among Chinese patients with precancerous ENT lesions: a descriptive qualitative study
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Chinese adult patients with clinically diagnosed precancerous ear, nose and throat (ENT) lesions who had used AI-driven chatbots for health information seeking |
| I — Intervention | Use of AI-driven chatbots for health-related information seeking |
| C — Comparator | Conventional search engines and healthcare professional consultations (implicit comparison) |
| O — Outcomes | Patient experiences, perceived benefits, challenges, and influences on information-seeking practices when using AI chatbots |
Bottom Line
This qualitative study explores Chinese patients' experiences using AI chatbots for health information about precancerous ENT lesions. Patients valued chatbots as accessible, conversational information sources that felt emotionally safer for sensitive questions compared to direct healthcare provider consultation. However, effectiveness depended on users developing prompting skills. While findings suggest potential complementary role for AI chatbots in patient education, the study has methodological limitations including small sample size, single-centre design, and insufficient detail on analytical rigour. The research addresses an important contemporary issue but requires replication in diverse populations and integration with studies evaluating chatbot accuracy and safety before clinical implementation recommendations can be made.
Key Findings
P Value: Not applicable for qualitative research
Effect Size: Not applicable for qualitative research
Primary Outcome: Four themes identified: AI chatbots as immediate accessible information source; shift from search engines to conversational seeking; importance of effective prompting skills; emotional safety in asking sensitive questions
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not applicable - qualitative study exploring patient experiences rather than diagnostic or therapeutic outcomes
Confidence Interval: Not applicable for qualitative research
Clinical Application
Moderate feasibility - requires patient digital literacy and access to AI chatbots. Implementation would need integration with existing patient education pathways Relevant to Australian practice given increasing AI adoption in healthcare. Would need consideration of TGA regulations for AI medical devices and integration with existing patient information resources. Cultural differences from Chinese context may affect transferability Patients with precancerous conditions seeking health information, particularly those comfortable with digital technology and conversational interfaces
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore how Chinese patients with precancerous ear, nose and throat (ENT) lesions experience using artificial intelligence (AI)-driven chatbots for health-related information seeking, with particular attention to perceived benefits, challenges and influences on information-seeking practices. DESIGN: Descriptive qualitative study. SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China. PARTICIPANTS: 12 adult patients with clinically diagnosed precancerous ENT lesions who had used AI-driven chatbots at least three times in the previous 30 days to seek health-related information about their condition were purposively recruited. Face-to-face, semistructured interviews were conducted between 11 October 2024 and 10 November 2024. RESULTS: Interviews were analysed using Colaizzi's method. Four themes were identified. First, participants described AI chatbots as an immediate and accessible source of health information, particularly when questions arose outside clinical encounters or during periods of uncertainty. Second, many reported moving away from conventional search engines towards conversational information seeking, valuing direct and synthesised responses over link-based retrieval. Third, participants emphasised that obtaining useful answers depended on learning to ask clear and specific questions, suggesting that effective prompting was an important user skill. Fourth, some participants perceived chatbot interaction as emotionally safer than asking healthcare professionals certain questions, particularly when they felt embarrassed, worried about asking repetitive questions or feared being judged. CONCLUSIONS: Among this sample of Chinese patients with precancerous ENT lesions, AI-driven chatbots were perceived as a convenient and conversational supplementary source of health information. Participants valued their accessibility and interactional ease, but also indicated that their usefulness depended partly on users' ability to formulate effective prompts. Some participants additionally perceived chatbots as a more comfortable channel for asking sensitive or basic questions. The findings suggest that AI chatbots may have a complementary role in patient information support, but further research is needed to evaluate response accuracy, safety and appropriate integration into clinician-led care.
References
- 1.Huang, Y., Liang, Q., Lin, Z., Zhang, M., Liu, X., Ding, L., Peng, R., & Yu, R. (2026). AI chatbots for health information seeking among Chinese patients with precancerous ENT lesions: a descriptive qualitative study. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102637
Related Research
Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung
Which nocturnal hypoxemia parameters are associated with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in adults with obstructive sleep apnea? A systematic review.
5 July 2026
Signal transduction and targeted therapy
Liposomal doxorubicin plus nab-paclitaxel with/without chemoradiotherapy in head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma: single-arm phase II study
14 June 2026
PloS one
Internet-based vestibular rehabilitation versus written instructions after acute vertigo: A randomised controlled trial
14 June 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service