Aflibercept and 5-FU vs. FOLFOX as 1st line treatment for older adults or frail elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer - The randomized phase 2 AIO / IKF ELDERLY trial (AIO-KRK-0117 / IKF 629)
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients ≥70 years with or without frailty, not eligible for full-dose combination therapy (n=120, median age 78.5 years, 82% frail) |
| I — Intervention | Dose-reduced mFOLFOX7 (Arm A) vs aflibercept 4mg/kg plus dose-reduced mLV5FU2 (Arm B) |
| C — Comparator | Head-to-head comparison of two dose-reduced first-line regimens |
| O — Outcomes | Primary: 6-month progression-free survival rate. Secondary: safety, overall survival, overall response rate, patient-reported outcomes, overall treatment utility |
Bottom Line
This randomised phase II trial in 120 elderly/frail metastatic colorectal cancer patients compared dose-reduced mFOLFOX7 versus aflibercept plus 5-FU as first-line therapy. The mFOLFOX7 arm demonstrated superior efficacy with 6-month progression-free survival of 68% versus 46%, median PFS of 7.9 versus 5.5 months, and response rates of 47% versus 22%. Importantly, the aflibercept combination showed higher toxicity with 17% versus 5% experiencing grade ≥3 treatment-related serious adverse events, particularly hypertension and proteinuria. Despite 82% of patients being classified as frail, overall survival was encouraging at approximately 20 months in both arms, likely reflecting effective subsequent therapies. These findings support dose-reduced mFOLFOX7 as the preferred option for elderly/frail patients, though the open-label design and phase II nature limit definitive conclusions. The study addresses a critical gap in evidence for this vulnerable population often excluded from major trials.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported for primary comparison
Effect Size: 22 percentage point difference in PFS@6 favoring mFOLFOX7
Primary Outcome: 6-month PFS rate: 68% (95%CI 56-80%) mFOLFOX7 vs 46% (95%CI 32-59%) aflibercept/5-FU
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Number needed to treat approximately 5 for one additional patient to achieve 6-month PFS with mFOLFOX7
Confidence Interval: 95%CI provided for primary endpoint only
Clinical Application
Both regimens feasible in elderly/frail population, though mFOLFOX7 showed superior efficacy with manageable toxicity profile Both regimens PBS-listed; findings support current COSA guidelines for dose-reduced therapy in elderly/frail mCRC patients Elderly (≥70 years) or frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer unsuitable for full-dose combination chemotherapy
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fluoropyrimidines + angiogenesis inhibitor or dose-reduced doublets are used for (frail) elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This non-comparative trial evaluated two 1st line regimens for patients not eligible for full-dose combinations. METHODS: This open-label, multicenter, phase II study randomized untreated mCRC patients ≥ 70 years ± frailty 1:1 to dose reduced mFOLFOX7 in Arm A or aflibercept (4 mg/kg) plus dose reduced mLV5FU2 in Arm B. Primary endpoint was the 6-months PFS rate (PFS@6), secondary endpoints included safety, overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), patient reported outcomes and overall treatment utility (OTU). FINDINGS: The full analysis population comprised 120 patients (62 Arm A, 58 Arm B; 63% male), with a median age of 78.5 years. 82% frail patients were included. PFS@6 was 68% [95%CI 56%;80%] in Arm A and 46% [32%;59%] in Arm B. Median PFS was 7.9 and 5.5 months, median OS was 20.4 and 19.0 months and ORR was 47% and 22% in Arm A and B, respectively. At 3 months, 52% in Arm A and 35% in Arm B had a good OTU. Most frequent grade ≥ 3 AEs in Arm B were hypertension (41%) and proteinuria (10%). More patients in arm B had treatment-related SAEs grade ≥ 3 (17% in arm B and 5% in arm A). INTERPRETATION: Both regimens were feasible in this (frail) elderly population. Dose-reduced mFOLFOX7 and, to a lesser extent, 5-FU/aflibercept showed good PFS and 3-month OTU. Although most patients were regarded frail, survival rates were promising, most likely due to effective further-line treatments.
Related Research
Cancer medicine
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1 Aug 2026
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
User perceptions of machine learning models as decision support for colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team conferences (AID-SIM-2): a qualitative simulation study.
1 Aug 2026
Journal of breast imaging
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
30 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service