Adverse childhood experiences and cognitive outcomes among older adults in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Adults aged 40 years and older in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) |
| I — Intervention | Exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) including parental death, neglect, mental health issues in family, hunger, and poor health in childhood |
| C — Comparator | No exposure to adverse childhood experiences or lower levels of ACE exposure |
| O — Outcomes | Cognitive outcomes including cognitive impairment and cognitive function; Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) |
Bottom Line
This systematic review provides preliminary evidence that adverse childhood experiences are associated with poorer cognitive outcomes in older adults from low- and middle-income countries, consistent with findings from high-income settings. However, the evidence base remains severely limited with only 14 studies identified, predominantly from upper-middle-income countries. Notably, no studies examined dementia outcomes despite this being a key objective. While parental death, neglect, and family mental health issues showed consistent associations with cognitive decline, other ACE types demonstrated inconsistent relationships. The review highlights substantial research gaps in understanding how childhood adversity contributes to cognitive aging in diverse LMIC contexts. Clinicians should be aware that patients from LMIC backgrounds with histories of childhood trauma may be at increased risk for cognitive decline, but current evidence is insufficient to guide specific screening or intervention strategies. The findings underscore the need for more comprehensive research across diverse LMIC settings before definitive clinical recommendations can be made.
Key Findings
P Value: Not provided for pooled analysis
Effect Size: Not quantified - narrative synthesis only
Primary Outcome: Cognitive impairment and cognitive function in older adults
Nnt Or Sensitivity: 10 of 14 studies (71%) reported significant associations between ACEs and poorer cognitive outcomes
Confidence Interval: Not provided
Clinical Application
Limited by lack of standardized ACE assessment tools and cognitive screening protocols in many LMIC healthcare systems Limited direct applicability to Australian practice given focus on LMIC populations, though may inform care of migrants from LMIC backgrounds and highlight importance of childhood trauma screening Adults aged 40+ in LMIC settings, particularly those with history of childhood adversity
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: While adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have been consistently linked to poorer cognitive outcomes in later life, far less is known about ACEs' contribution to dementia and cognitive ageing risk in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), despite their growing and disproportionate share of global Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) burden. This study aimed to systematically review existing evidence on the association between individual ACEs and cognitive outcomes among adults aged 40 years and older in LMIC settings. DESIGN: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCE: We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL from the inception of each database to January 2026. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Observational studies examining the association between individual ACEs and cognitive outcomes among adults aged 40 and older in LMICs. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently screened each record, assessed risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool and extracted data. Results were illustrated using descriptive forest plots and a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Our systematic review included 14 studies, primarily from upper-middle-income countries, that assessed the relationship between individual ACEs and cognitive impairment (n=4) and function (n=10). 10 studies reported significant associations between ACEs and poorer cognitive function and increased risk of cognitive impairment. No study assessed the association between ACEs and ADRD. Parental death, neglect and mental health issues in the family showed consistent associations with cognitive outcomes, whereas experiencing hunger and poor health in childhood showed inconsistent associations. CONCLUSIONS: Our review corroborated evidence from high-income countries that exposure to ACEs is associated with a long-term risk of poorer cognitive outcomes among older populations in LMICs. However, the available literature remains limited, with most studies originating from upper-middle-income countries, few examining cognitive impairment and none assessing ADRD. These findings underscore substantial gaps in knowledge and highlight the need for research across diverse LMIC settings to clarify the role of broader psychosocial and contextual childhood experiences in shaping cognitive ageing and dementia risk. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024501816.
References
- 1.Ngwa, C. H., Abdulrahim, S., Nehme, R., Saad, M., Kabalan, M., Lteif, M. R., Yazbek, Y., Chaaya, M., & Elbejjani, M. (2026). Adverse childhood experiences and cognitive outcomes among older adults in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMJ Open, 16(4), e112648. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112648
Related Research
Sleep medicine
Concordance of wearable device sleep metrics with patient-reported sleep quality: A systematic review
3 Aug 2026
Sleep medicine reviews
Machine and deep learning in REM sleep behavior disorder: a scoping review and analysis of reporting quality
3 Aug 2026
Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology
Efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with GRADE assessment
1 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service