Accuracy of muscle ultrasonography in detecting fasciculations for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Patients suspected of having amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or undergoing diagnostic evaluation for motor neuron disease |
| I — Intervention | Muscle ultrasonography (MUS) for fasciculation detection |
| C — Comparator | Reference standard diagnostic criteria for ALS (likely revised El Escorial criteria or clinical diagnosis) |
| O — Outcomes | Diagnostic accuracy measures: sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under ROC curve |
Bottom Line
This well-conducted meta-analysis of 13 studies (1176 participants) demonstrates that muscle ultrasonography has good diagnostic accuracy for detecting fasciculations in ALS, with pooled sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 91%. The positive likelihood ratio of 9.81 indicates that a positive test substantially increases the probability of ALS diagnosis. Scan duration significantly affects performance, with longer scanning (≥30 seconds) improving sensitivity but reducing specificity. While promising as an adjunct to electrodiagnostic testing, the technique requires standardized protocols and further validation before routine clinical implementation. The high area under the curve (0.94) suggests excellent overall diagnostic performance, potentially valuable in early ALS detection where fasciculations may be subtle.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported in abstract
Effect Size: Pooled sensitivity 0.87, specificity 0.91
Primary Outcome: Diagnostic accuracy of muscle ultrasonography for fasciculation detection in ALS
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Positive LR 9.81 (95% CI 6.25-15.40), Negative LR 0.14 (95% CI 0.10-0.19), AUC 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.95)
Confidence Interval: Sensitivity 95% CI 0.83-0.91, Specificity 95% CI 0.86-0.94
Clinical Application
Requires trained ultrasonographers and standardized protocols; scan duration affects accuracy with ≥30s improving sensitivity Could complement EMG/NCS in Australian neurology services; may reduce diagnostic delays and improve access in regional areas where neurophysiology services are limited Patients undergoing evaluation for suspected ALS or motor neuron disease in neurology clinics
Abstract
PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of muscle ultrasonography in detecting fasciculations for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: Following PRISMA-DTA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, Sinomed, Web of Science, CNKI and VIP for studies published up to July 8, 2025 that evaluated muscle ultrasonography to detect fasciculations for ALS diagnosis. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251057866). Studies were screened using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and data were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed with QUADAS-2. Statistical analyses (Stata 16.0 and R 4.5.1 with the "midas," "metandi," and "mada" packages) were used to calculate pooled sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). We constructed forest plots, hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves, summary ROC (SROC) curves and calculated the area under the SROC curve (AUC). Univariate meta-regression and subgroup analyses explored sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test. Fagan nomograms were also used to illustrate the changes from pre-test to post-test probability and to enhance clinical interpretability. RESULTS: Thirteen studies involving 1176 participants met the inclusion criteria. Muscle ultrasonography for fasciculation detection in ALS yielded a pooled sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.91) and specificity of 0.91 (95% CI 0.86-0.94). The pooled LR+ was 9.81 (95% CI 6.25-15.40) and LR- was 0.14 (95% CI 0.10-0.19), with a DOR of 70.03 (95% CI 41.72-117.56). The area under the SROC curve was 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.95). Meta-regression identified scan duration as a primary factor influencing diagnostic accuracy, with scan durations ≥ 30 s associated with higher sensitivity but relatively lower specificity. Deeks' funnel plot showed no significant asymmetry (p = 0.61), indicating no notable publication bias. Fagan nomograms showed that, at a pre-test probability of 30%, the post-test probability increased to 81% after a positive MUS result and decreased to 6% after a negative result. CONCLUSION: Muscle ultrasonography demonstrates good pooled diagnostic accuracy for detecting fasciculations in ALS and may serve as a useful adjunct to electrodiagnostic evaluation. Scan duration appears to significantly affect the diagnostic performance, with longer scanning improving sensitivity at the cost of reduced specificity. We speculate that prolonged scanning may be more useful in clinical scenarios where fasciculations are subtle or atypical, whereas shorter scanning may be sufficient when fasciculations are already readily apparent. Nevertheless, further large-scale prospective studies are needed to validate standardized scanning protocols and to better define the clinical role of MUS in ALS diagnostic pathways.
References
- 1.Tang, Z., Lei, Y., Huang, J., He, R., Wu, Y., Li, M., Ye, Z., He, X., Heng, H., Zha, Y., & Wei, J. (2026). Accuracy of muscle ultrasonography in detecting fasciculations for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2011.11.262
Related Research
Sleep medicine reviews
Machine and deep learning in REM sleep behavior disorder: a scoping review and analysis of reporting quality
3 Aug 2026
Neurological research
Federated deep learning model for epilepsy seizure detection using electroencephalogram (EEG) signal
2 Aug 2026
Journal of psychiatric research
Systematic review of machine learning and deep learning models for EEG-based detection of depression.
2 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service