Yale Simulation Study Reveals Key Insights on AI Decision Support Acceptance in GI Bleeding — Implications for Australian Emergency Medicine

References

1. 1.Yale University. (2024). Artificial Intelligent Clinical Decision Support System Simulation Center Study: Trust and Usefulness of Machine Learning Risk Stratification Tool for Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using the Technology Acceptance Model. ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT05816473. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05816473
2. 2.Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
3. 3.Laine, L., & Jensen, D. M. (2012). Management of patients with ulcer bleeding. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 107(3), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2012.57
4. 4.Hearnshaw, S. A., Logan, R. F., Lowe, D., Travis, S. P., Murphy, M. F., & Palmer, K. R. (2011). Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, diagnoses and outcomes in the 2007 UK audit. Gut, 60(10), 1327-1335. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2010.228437
5. 5.Stanley, A. J., Laine, L., Dalton, H. R., Ngu, J. H., Schultz, M., Abazi, R., ... & International Gastrointestinal Bleeding Consortium. (2017). Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study. BMJ, 356, i6432. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6432