Health Technology/clinical-trials

Randomised Crossover Trial Evaluates ChatGPT-5.2 Against Conventional Statistical Tools in Undergraduate Dental Education — Implications for Health Professions Training

247 Health News Editorial

·

23 July 2026

·

4 min read

·clinical-trials

A randomised crossover trial at Alexandria University is comparing ChatGPT-5.2 with conventional statistical tools — including Microsoft Excel and online calculators — as educational aids for biostatistics training among 220 fifth-year dental students. The findings, expected in late 2026, could reshape how statistical literacy is taught across health professions curricula globally.

Originally reported by ClinicalTrials.gov

References

  1. 1.Elshabrawy, R. (2026). Usability and efficacy of artificial intelligence chatbots as an educational aid for statistical data analysis among dental students: A randomized crossover trial. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07684651
  2. 2.Polychronopoulou, A., & Kawala, B. (2010). Attitudes of dental students at six European dental schools toward statistics. Journal of Dental Education, 74(5), 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2010.74.5.tb04896.x
  3. 3.Senn, S. (2002). Cross-over trials in clinical research (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470854596
  4. 4.Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A 'quick and dirty' usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis.
  5. 5.Windish, D. M., Huot, S. J., & Green, M. L. (2007). Medicine residents' understanding of the biostatistics and results in the medical literature. JAMA, 298(9), 1010–1022. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.9.1010
Share:XLinkedIn
2

247 Health News Editorial

247 Health News is a medical intelligence platform delivering evidence-based research appraisals, clinical trial monitoring, and health technology news for healthcare professionals.

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service