Phase IV Trial Completed: AI-Guided Venipuncture Device vs Manual Technique — First-Attempt Success Rate Results

References

1. 1.Seoul National University Hospital. (2024). A Single-Center, Randomized, Crossover, Prospective, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Confirmatory Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of an AI- and Ultrasound-Based Medical Device That Assists Venipuncture. ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT07383870. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07383870
2. 2.Sebbane, M., Claret, P. G., Lefebvre, S., Mercier, G., Rubenovitch, J., Jreige, R., Dumont, R., Lefrant, J. Y., & de La Coussaye, J. E. (2013). Predicting peripheral venous access difficulty in the emergency department using body mass index and a clinical evaluation of venous accessibility. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 44(2), 299-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.07.051
3. 3.Heinrichs, J., Fritze, Z., Vandermeer, B., Klassen, T., & Curtis, S. (2013). Ultrasonographically guided peripheral intravenous cannulation of children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 61(4), 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.11.014
4. 4.Wellek, S., & Blettner, M. (2012). On the proper use of the crossover design in clinical trials. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 109(15), 276-281. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2012.0276
5. 5.Dychter, S. S., Gold, D. A., Carson, D., & Haller, M. (2012). Intravenous therapy: a review of complications and economic considerations of peripheral access. Journal of Infusion Nursing, 35(2), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0b013e31826d9039
6. 6.Rippey, J. C., Cooke, M. L., Tan, R., Hanel, N., Rosen, L., Gough, A., Leung, M., & Tran, N. (2016). Predicting and preventing peripheral intravenous cannula insertion failure in the emergency department: clinician 'gestalt' wins again. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 28(6), 658-665. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.12695