Health Technology/clinical-trials

EHR-Integrated CGM Decision Support Trial Targets Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care

247 Health News Editorial

·

17 Apr 2026

·

3 min read

·clinical-trials

New trial examines whether integrating CGM data into electronic health records through smart order sets can improve glucose management in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes patients. The study targets primary care settings where CGM data often remains underutilised despite widespread device adoption.

Originally reported by ClinicalTrials.gov

References

  1. 1.Ajjan, R. A., Cummings, M. H., Jennings, P., Leelarathna, L., Rayman, G., & Wilmot, E. G. (2018). Optimising use of rate of change trend arrows for insulin dosing decisions in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 20(8), 531-540. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2018.0095
  2. 2.American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. (2024). 7. Diabetes technology: Standards of care in diabetes—2024. Diabetes Care, 47(Supplement_1), S126-S144. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-S007
  3. 3.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2023). Diabetes in Australia. AIHW. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/diabetes/diabetes-in-australia
  4. 4.Battelino, T., Danne, T., Bergenstal, R. M., Amiel, S. A., Beck, R., Biester, T., ... & Phillip, M. (2019). Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care, 42(8), 1593-1603. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci19-0028
  5. 5.Beck, R. W., Bergenstal, R. M., Cheng, P., Kollman, C., Carlson, A. L., Johnson, M. L., & Rodbard, D. (2019). The relationships between time in range, hyperglycemia metrics, and HbA1c. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 13(4), 614-626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296818822496
  6. 6.Bergenstal, R. M., Beck, R. W., Close, K. L., Grunberger, G., Sacks, D. B., Kowalski, A., ... & Aleppo, G. (2018). Glucose management indicator (GMI): a new term for estimating A1C from continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care, 41(11), 2275-2280. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-1581
  7. 7.Bright, T. J., Wong, A., Dhurjati, R., Bristow, E., Bastian, L., Coeytaux, R. R., ... & Lobach, D. (2012). Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 157(1), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00450
  8. 8.Curran, G. M., Bauer, M., Mittman, B., Pyne, J. M., & Stetler, C. (2012). Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Medical Care, 50(3), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812
  9. 9.HealthPartners Institute. (2024). Translating Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Data Into Action to Improve Management of Insulin-Treated T2D in Primary Care. ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT07394075. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07394075
  10. 10.Polonsky, W. H., Hessler, D., Ruedy, K. J., & Beck, R. W. (2017). The impact of continuous glucose monitoring on markers of quality of life in adults with type 1 diabetes: further findings from the DIAMOND randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care, 40(6), 736-741. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-0133
  11. 11.Therapeutic Goods Administration. (2024). Continuous glucose monitoring systems. Australian Government Department of Health. https://www.tga.gov.au/products/medical-devices/medical-device-types/continuous-glucose-monitoring-systems
Share:XLinkedIn
2

247 Health News Editorial

247 Health News is a medical intelligence platform delivering evidence-based research appraisals, clinical trial monitoring, and health technology news for healthcare professionals.

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service