Completed Study Validates AI-Supported Pain Assessment Device Against Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Back Pain
247 Health News Editorial
·17 May 2026
·4 min read
·clinical-trialsA completed validation study from Turkey demonstrates correlation between AI-supported electrical stimulation technology and traditional pain assessment methods in 78 chronic back pain patients. Results could revolutionise objective pain measurement in clinical practice.
Originally reported by ClinicalTrials.gov
References
- 1.Amasya University. (2024). Validity of an AI-Supported Whole-Body Electrical Stimulation Device for Spinal Pain Assessment: A Comparison With Self-Reported Pain Scores. ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT07244237. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07244237
- 2.Hartvigsen, J., Hancock, M. J., Kongsted, A., Louw, Q., Ferreira, M. L., Genevay, S., Hoy, D., Karppinen, J., Pransky, G., Sieper, J., Smeets, R. J., & Underwood, M. (2018). What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. The Lancet, 391(10137), 2356-2367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X
- 3.Hjermstad, M. J., Fayers, P. M., Haugen, D. F., Caraceni, A., Hanks, G. W., Loge, J. H., Fainsinger, R., Aass, N., & Kaasa, S. (2011). Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 41(6), 1073-1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016
- 4.Koes, B. W., van Tulder, M., Lin, C. W. C., Macedo, L. G., McAuley, J., & Maher, C. (2010). An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. European Spine Journal, 19(12), 2075-2094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1502-y
- 5.Arendt-Nielsen, L., & Yarnitsky, D. (2009). Experimental and clinical applications of quantitative sensory testing applied to skin, muscles and viscera. The Journal of Pain, 10(6), 556-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2009.02.002
- 6.Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Farrar, J. T., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Katz, N. P., Kerns, R. D., Stucki, G., Allen, R. R., Bellamy, N., Carr, D. B., Chandler, J., Cowan, P., Dionne, R., Galer, B. S., Hertz, S., Jadad, A. R., Kramer, L. D., Manning, D. C., ... Witter, J. (2005). Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain, 113(1-2), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012
2
247 Health News Editorial
247 Health News is a medical intelligence platform delivering evidence-based research appraisals, clinical trial monitoring, and health technology news for healthcare professionals.
Related Articles
clinical-trials
Digital Health Platform vs Case Manager Support in Hypertension Management: Taiwan's 1,726-Participant Trial Signals a Shift in Blood Pressure Care Delivery
3 Aug 2026
clinical-trials
Phase II Trial: AI-Powered Wysa Chatbot vs Unmet Need — Digital Eating Disorder Prevention in At-Risk Adolescents
3 Aug 2026
clinical-trials
Pilot Trial Targets the Inpatient-to-Outpatient Gap: Digital Smoking Cessation Intervention for Persons With Serious Mental Illness — Key Findings for Clinicians
3 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service